Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-09-2014, 04:48 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,356,787 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

Pres. Obama is calling for $10.10 minimum wage, whereas Seattle socialists (and presumably others to follow) have enacted a $15 minimum wage. That's just about a 50% difference. This is prima fascie evidence that these numbers are simply being pulled out of peoples' posteriors.

Suppose Obama proposed a return to the 55 mph national speed limit to save energy, and others said that no, we need to impose a 36 mph limit (36+50%=55). Would you conclude that either number was based on engineering principles, or figure that one or the other, or both, were numbers just pulled out of the air?

 
Old 06-09-2014, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Pres. Obama is calling for $10.10 minimum wage, whereas Seattle socialists (and presumably others to follow) have enacted a $15 minimum wage. That's just about a 50% difference. This is prima fascie evidence that these numbers are simply being pulled out of peoples' posteriors.

Suppose Obama proposed a return to the 55 mph national speed limit to save energy, and others said that no, we need to impose a 36 mph limit (36+50%=55). Would you conclude that either number was based on engineering principles, or figure that one or the other, or both, were numbers just pulled out of the air?
That sounds about right, the country should be about $10 for minimum wage and more expensive areas should be higher than that.
 
Old 06-09-2014, 06:47 PM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,176,768 times
Reputation: 2375
Why not just do away with it all together? But, that will never happen so I just don't go to places that become too expensive. So sure, let the "lets do something" crowd make it 15-20 bucks an hour and see more small business go under, more empty store fronts, few entry level jobs ...bring it on!
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:06 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,273,411 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
Why not just do away with it all together? But, that will never happen so I just don't go to places that become too expensive. So sure, let the "lets do something" crowd make it 15-20 bucks an hour and see more small business go under, more empty store fronts, few entry level jobs ...bring it on!
Why because then business can pay whatever they want they can pay $2 hour if they want. You are right it should not be $15-20 but $9-10 is a lot more manageable for business to start.
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:08 PM
 
241 posts, read 189,153 times
Reputation: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
Why because then business can pay whatever they want they can pay $2 hour if they want. You are right it should not be $15-20 but $9-10 is a lot more manageable for business to start.
Without an artifically-imposed minimum wage, employers would actually pay what their employees are worth. That's the way it should be.
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earn Your Own Keep View Post
Without an artifically-imposed minimum wage, employers would actually pay what their employees are worth. That's the way it should be.
Ah yes, people should be paid the least amount possible, which you are basically saying you think it is okay for people to be paid as little as a dollar a day. What is a cashier worth?
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:21 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,563 posts, read 81,147,605 times
Reputation: 57767
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Ah yes, people should be paid the least amount possible, which you are basically saying you think it is okay for people to be paid as little as a dollar a day. What is a cashier worth?
I would say that a cashier is not worth much at all, in fact when I go to the supermarket or Home Depot I always use the self-check to avoid their plastic, rehearsed niceties. We went out to a nice dinner tonight at good restaurant that costs us about $50 for two, and they now have two new features on their smartphone app to save their staff even more time/work. They offer a $5 discount if you pre-order by smartphone, or if you pay by smartphone from the table so the waitstaff don't have to bring the bill, go ring it up and return with the receipt. We took advantage of the latter. We still gave a generous (25%) tip because the service was great, but let's face it, technology is making people's work easier and they don't need as many, that drives down their value (salaries).
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:24 PM
 
241 posts, read 189,153 times
Reputation: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Ah yes, people should be paid the least amount possible, which you are basically saying you think it is okay for people to be paid as little as a dollar a day. What is a cashier worth?
A cashier is worth no more than his or her replacement...



Ahhhhhh, technology.
 
Old 06-09-2014, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earn Your Own Keep View Post
A cashier is worth no more than his or her replacement...



Ahhhhhh, technology.
And how much is the technology worth? Oh and that isn't the best way to figure out someone's worth because you are assuming the technology wouldn't be used if the value of an employee was low enough. That would be an incorrect assumption, as technology advances, we as society will use that technology regardless of the worth of an employee.
 
Old 06-10-2014, 12:30 AM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And how much is the technology worth? Oh and that isn't the best way to figure out someone's worth because you are assuming the technology wouldn't be used if the value of an employee was low enough. That would be an incorrect assumption, as technology advances, we as society will use that technology regardless of the worth of an employee.
Yup, once technology does it better then you ever can for less then the cost of a human beings survival....thats it. done. You are replaced.

And the kind of technology thats being rapidly created will do this in ever increasing numbers. LOL, I kinda hope a Rep president is the next one so that we can be in awe at the ever increasing unemployment. And the massive debate about what to do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top