Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because we decided to live in civilization. If that's still over your head, there are a number of African nations that you might find more accommodating. Please seek them out.
Yes I would. Again also, I support the right for gay couples to marry. What I don't support is the government forcing those that disagree into re-education classes.
I think a case could be made for a first time discrimination offender to think re-education classes are onerous. It would depend on what is being required. I would need detail before deciding for certain. Maybe we have some rare middle ground as to the "penalty" part of this discussion anyways. However, someone said in an earlier post that it was not the case here.
I think a case could be made for a first time discrimination offender to think re-education classes are onerous. It would depend on what is being required. I would need detail before deciding for certain. Maybe we have some rare middle ground as to the "penalty" part of this discussion anyways. However, someone said in an earlier post that it was not the case here.
I believe one could have a rational discussion on this. There may even be opt outs but not ones that would likely be well received.
I'll try.....We do require a business to have a business license. Now I know the first argument is that there shouldn't be a business license.
There is. I'm pretty anti myself but I can't get too worked up over this. To get this license you agree to certain things. Such as you will serve the community, period.....because the community is going to serve you by providing police and fire services.
If you want to opt out of these, so be it. Under no scenario would I accept re-education classes.
I think a case could be made for a first time discrimination offender to think re-education classes are onerous. It would depend on what is being required. I would need detail before deciding for certain. Maybe we have some rare middle ground as to the "penalty" part of this discussion anyways. However, someone said in an earlier post that it was not the case here.
I believe one could have a rational discussion on this. There may even be opt outs but not ones that would likely be well received.
I'll try.....We do require a business to have a business license. Now I know the first argument is that there shouldn't be a business license.
There is. I'm pretty anti myself but I can't get too worked up over this. To get this license you agree to certain things. Such as you will serve the community, period.....because the community is going to serve you by providing police and fire services.
If you want to opt out of these, so be it. Under no scenario would I accept re-education classes.
Not all businesses need a license.......I do not need or, have one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ugghh! GOD just visualizing that scene in my head makes me want to throw up in my mouth a bit.