Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2014, 12:38 PM
 
461 posts, read 556,165 times
Reputation: 444

Advertisements

Trading blame between Obama and Bush for the rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is useless. It is the US invasion of Iraq that brought Islamic fundamentalist terrorists from all over the world into Iraq. Saddam did plenty to crush them when he was in power, they only became relevant once the US found itself in and chaos ensued. They started this problem, so it was only right they end it, yes? The US stayed for years to defeat al-Qaeda, only to fail at that, destroy the Iraqi state, and directly/indirectly cause the death of a million Iraqis along the way (and 3,000 US troops, since that seems to be all we care about). Al-Qaeda has since reemerged. Good job Bush.

In Syria, the US - and that's both Republican and Democrat warhawks - spent three years saying Assad must go, completely ignoring the will of the Syrian people, a majority of whom are believed to still support him (and I'm not talking about the recent "election") and the secular state he leads. The US armed "rebels," insisting they were moderates, ignoring their targeting of Syrian Christian and Syrian Alawite communities, their beheadings of civilians and Syrian troops, and their imposing of harsh Sharia law in areas they rule. The US insisted there were moderates among these rebels, but could not name a single faction. Nor did the US seem to care that groups like ISIS were welcomed with open arms by the rebels. Clashes between ISIS and other rebels started when ISIS dumped them, not when they dumped ISIS. ISIS found the other rebels to be not extreme enough - even though they were plenty extreme. Actually, ISIS' biggest enemy in Syria is the Nusra Front, which is al-Qaeda's main affiliate in Syria. Time to end the myth that moderate rebels exist. Good job Obama.

Is this a US policy of divide and conquer or are we just stupid? Does anybody care that among the Syrian rebel jihadists are thousands of Americans and Europeans who will come home one day and destabilize our country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2014, 12:42 PM
 
Location: USA
7,474 posts, read 7,034,396 times
Reputation: 12513
America has a stunningly bad track record in the Middle East. Let's not forget the mess of the Iran - Iraqi war, the creation of Bin Laden to fight Russia, and so on.

At this point, yes, we need to take a new look at our policies since what we've been doing has been a stunning failure... unless the goal is to create a never-ending supply of terrorists, tyrants, and wars to fight...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 01:09 PM
 
461 posts, read 556,165 times
Reputation: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
America has a stunningly bad track record in the Middle East. Let's not forget the mess of the Iran - Iraqi war, the creation of Bin Laden to fight Russia, and so on.

At this point, yes, we need to take a new look at our policies since what we've been doing has been a stunning failure... unless the goal is to create a never-ending supply of terrorists, tyrants, and wars to fight...
Agreed, and I find it rather absurd that people can blame or defend Obama for something that is the fault of US policy more than it is a party policy. They're all guilty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 01:26 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
I heard that "al-quaeda is on the run"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,092,838 times
Reputation: 767
Obamas foreign policies or political stances regarding the Middle East have been lousy. The United States over the collective years fails to grasp the concept of the Middle East and it's issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 03:04 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
shrug. nuke em, it would have been cheaper, slowed down global warming, and made our oil worth more on the open market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 03:08 PM
 
3,445 posts, read 6,066,134 times
Reputation: 6133
Just take the handcuffs off Israel and we would have less of a problem.

The US is not the cause of terrorism. Islam is evil and has always given rise to terror groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 10:38 PM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,870,141 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virtual Insanity View Post
Agreed, and I find it rather absurd that people can blame or defend Obama for something that is the fault of US policy more than it is a party policy. They're all guilty.
Hey, central banks want to splay, man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 10:44 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,856,573 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
I heard that "al-quaeda is on the run"?
They are; they are running all over the Middle east. Its said that group up threatens even Jordan now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 10:53 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,952,731 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambler123 View Post
America has a stunningly bad track record in the Middle East. Let's not forget the mess of the Iran - Iraqi war, the creation of Bin Laden to fight Russia, and so on.

At this point, yes, we need to take a new look at our policies since what we've been doing has been a stunning failure... unless the goal is to create a never-ending supply of terrorists, tyrants, and wars to fight...
Perhaps that is the goal. If so than mission accomplished. Creating more enemies gives you a great excuse for increasing the defense budget, ad nauseum. And the banks make money funding it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top