Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok, we've spent billions in Iraq, spilled the blood of our soldiers and trashed our economy and now we're going to do exactly what with 300 advisors?
Create hostage targets?
This is nonsense. 300 advisors to train or advise those we've advised for years already?
Go team!
We're going to end up sending 3,000 to get the 300 out and then send 30,000 to get the 3000.
Watch.
Mack, You posted about an hour ago and no one replied...Sorry to say folks care more about there Iphones than our countries wars.. If we send more men and women into combat we should start the draft ..No deferments.NONE..Then we will see a concerned America.
Mack, You posted about an hour ago and no one replied...Sorry to say folks care more about there Iphones than our countries wars.. If we send more men and women into combat we should start the draft ..No deferments.NONE..Then we will see a concerned America.
Or..........If we instituted a "War Tax" to actually pay for these adventures, then you would see us not so ready to throw our money and kids into these political games.
We actually spent closer to 1.5 TRILLION during our 2nd Iraq war. It's very much different than Vietnam but people like that analogy for some reason. I'm against us being there at all but i was also against the first 2 wars there
I grew up in the '60's and this is eerily similar. Advisors my butt!
I grew up in the '60's, as well, but it seemed that back then people were not as apathetic.
Sadly, I fear we have come to a place where our country will never not be at war. It's disgusting that our self-serving politicians no longer represent any of us and we just keep voting the same idiots in.
Despicable Obama now claiming that it was not his call to leave Iraq.
He's despicable because he's a habitual liar.
He now blames the Iraqi prime minister for our troops leaving.
However, here's what he said at the time....."With regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should be a status of forces agreement," Romney told Obama as the two convened on the Lynn University campus in Boca Raton, Fla., that October evening. "That’s not true," Obama interjected. “Oh, you didn't want a status of forces agreement?” Romney asked as an argument ensued. “No,” Obama said. “What I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.”
He is a man of very little (if any) character. He took full credit during the election for removing ALL troops from Iraq, now places blame on someone else. This is what we've come to expect from him.
Those who support him will still argue against all of the facts out there, which is a shame.
He has done an excellent job as President, the perfect counterweight to the ignorance, recklessness, and embarrassment of the President who preceded him.
What makes it even better is how adept he is at enraging wingnuts, which only affirms that this man is doing an excellent job. (Truth be told, it is FOX News, Limbaugh, and all the other screechers responsible for all this rage)
If wingnuts do not like him, you know he is doing a good job. Wingnuts liked George Walker Bush, who was arguably the worst President in U.S. history.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.