Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95
I'm the last person here that would want to be seen as a Hillary supporter, but in this case I don't believe "viewpoint control" is the intent of her commentary here.
|
Then you need to go back and review Billary from about 1994 onward.
She has been a constant ardent advocate of "viewpoint control."
Why do you think I posted the video?
Do you even
get the video?
It isn't merely that Billary was calling for government to have
more "viewpoint control" over the US media than they already have, it's that the clip was broadcast in another foreign State,
because your lame-stream Media wouldn't show it.
Get it?
Your own lame Media wouldn't show Americans a video of Billary testifying before a congressional committee that the government needs more media control.....
....instead, Americans have to go to other foreign countries to get news about their damn government and what their government trying to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95
We're not talking about the Constitution here in it's entirety, just an Amendment which is the source of perpetual debate as to intent....
|
You mean the Straw Man Arguments? The intent of the 2nd Amendment, as well as the other 9 Amendments and the entire Constitution is crystal clear....you just have to read what the Framer's wrote and discussed in their committee notes, letters and diaries.
In modern legal jargon, it's called "Legislative History."
Why was EMTALA enacted? To give poor people and illegal immigrants "free" healthcare?
No, wrong.....read the legislative history; the committee notes, and the testimony before Congress.
You have EMTALA, because people --- just like you --- who had insurance were sent to the nearest hospital, which was often "
Out-of-Network." And then you died
en route while being transported to another hospital that was "
In-Network"....and all because you had the wrong health plan coverage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95
... and which has outlived it's relevance by a hundred years.
|
Really.....there hasn't been a dictatorship or totalitarian regime in more than 100 years?
Is that what you're saying?
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to defend against would-be dictators in the US, not hunt pheasant.
You are already living in a Police State.
The first thing the Police State does is purge all non-believers.....any bureaucrat who does not subscribe to The Paradigm™ is purged.....you know, that's why Lenin exiled Trotsky.
That is why whistle-blowers are being attacked, vilified and prosecuted.
And then what you see, what you hear and what you read in the Media is filtered, censored, and controlled; everything else is spin.
Those people seen being shot by police? Never happened.....that was merely an exercise in which citizens were attempting to catch bullets with their bare hands; many failed, suffering serious injury; and then they later succumbed to their injuries.
Pointedly...
Mircea
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They are free to move to Holland where there is a no gun law and daily people die to criminals robbing or killing others with the use of a gun that they can't buy in a gun store and the victims have nothing to protect themselves with and the criminals are aware of that!
And I'm the one who is deluded? Lol! 
