Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2014, 01:59 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Please tell us just WHERE/WHEN there was ever a vote on whether to invade Iraq or not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post


What is it you don't understand about the large difference between 'authorizing' and 'mandating'?

I want to know WHEN there was ever a vote specifically about ordering an Iraq invasion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2014, 02:04 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What is it you don't understand about the large difference between 'authorizing' and 'mandating'?

I want to know WHEN there was ever a vote specifically about ordering an Iraq invasion?
I know you didn't ask when there was a vote that mandated war.

Quote:
Please tell us just WHERE/WHEN there was ever a vote on whether to invade Iraq or not?
You asked when there was a vote. Don't get mad at me because you meant to ask a silly question. War is always up to the president, Congress is just suppose to authorize it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 02:11 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I know you didn't ask when there was a vote that mandated war.

You asked when there was a vote. Don't get mad at me because you meant to ask a silly question. War is always up to the president, Congress is just suppose to authorize it.
BULL!

ONLY Congress can declare war which it hasn't done since 1941, the POTUS cannot despite your allegation of war always being up to the POTUS.

I asked a legitimate question, you're apparently ignorant of just how war gets declared and supplied a silly answer instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 02:18 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
BULL!

ONLY Congress can declare war, the POTUS cannot despite your allegation.

I asked a legitimate question, you're apparently ignorant of just how war gets declared and supplied a silly answer instead.
You asked when there was a vote. I provided it. I think you didn't even realize there was an authorization vote.

The United States has formally declared war against foreign nations five separate times, each upon prior request by the President of the United States.

Declaration of war by the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No, Congress did not DEMAND war but that is a meaningless, worthless distinction. They didn't for any of the others either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 02:55 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You asked when there was a vote. I provided it. I think you didn't even realize there was an authorization vote.
No, I asked when there was ever a vote whether to invade or not and you imagined something that has never existed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The United States has formally declared war against foreign nations five separate times, each upon prior request by the President of the United States.

Declaration of war by the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
At the 'request' of the POTUS but ONLY by the action of Congress.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No, Congress did not DEMAND war but that is a meaningless, worthless distinction. They didn't for any of the others either.
No, I don't believe it's meaningless at all. I think we need to revamp exactly how we go to war. I believe the invasion/occupation of a sovereign nation, especially one that's done nothing to the US, should require a declaration of war be made by Congress. Let the armchair warriors who have NO problem spending the blood and $$$ of others while sitting on their collective ass sign their names to an order for war and be held responsible for what they've done..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,739,062 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason3000 View Post
Yes he probably had WMD's, that's a solid bet. That's not grounds for attacking a sovereign foreign nation who hadn't threatened us though! One of our damn business is what it was.
didn't the congress vote to go in to Iraq? Do you think you are a better judge of what we should or should not do than those who have knowledge and experience? I certainly do not think I am; I have my opinions, but I also respect those who know than I do. and believe it or not, hind sight is 20/20. It isn't going to do much good now to say: oh. we should or should not have done thus and so. Now, we have do what we can to mend the damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 03:03 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,678,440 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
I have always loved the "Pauls" view on foreign engagement.

However its their stance on many other national programs that a vast majority of Americans enjoy, and are willing to be taxed for to keep, in which Senator Paul and his father would like to see abolished that I do have a problem with.
Your problem is that you think the federal government is supposed to do everything. Most people think the federal government should not be involved in social welfare, or education at the state level. That does not mean they want to ban education or social welfare, it just means the feds should not be meddling in it.

Many other people think the states and local governemnts can do many of the things our inept federal government has taken upon itself to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 03:05 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
No, I asked when there was ever a vote whether to invade or not and you imagined something that has never existed.
I posted the vote that authorized it.

Quote:
At the 'request' of the POTUS but ONLY by the action of Congress.
Which for right or wrong is exactly what happened.

Quote:
No, I don't believe it's meaningless at all. I think we need to revamp exactly how we go to war. I believe the invasion/occupation of a sovereign nation, especially one that's done nothing to the US, should require a declaration of war be made by Congress. Let the armchair warriors who have NO problem spending the blood and $$$ of others while sitting on their collective ass sign their names to an order for war and be held responsible for what they've done..
There was.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1 View Post
On global security issues Ron Paul doesn't see further than his nose. With that said, Middle East is a mess and there is nothing the US can do to fix the situation. There are no good guys and democracy seems very far. Even if one group "wins", instability will continue.
So yes, we shouldn't get involved because there is nothing we can contribute.
Ron Paul is not the subject here stay on topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 03:11 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
Ron Paul is not the subject here stay on topic.
The odd thing is they agree with Ron Paul's long held position but yet can't resist the dig. If Paul doesn't understand but oberon agree's with him what does that say about oberon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top