Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2014, 09:42 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Sounds like higher taxes will be necessary to fund the process of obtaining search warrants.
I guess they will have to selectively make searches instead of going on fishing trips.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2014, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
A supporter of the 4th Amendment but hater of the 2nd.
When have I ever said I hated the 2nd Amendment? You must be one of those people who thinks they should have access to nuclear weapons because of the 2nd Amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2014, 09:50 AM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,747,999 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Supreme Court limits police searches of cellphones

WASHINGTON —- Cellphones and smartphones generally cannot be searched by police without a warrant during arrests, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday in a major victory for privacy rights.


This is definitely a win for Americans!
Everyone should be able to agree this is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2014, 10:26 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
I still hate that they included an exclusion because it's going to be abused.

Basically it's an NSA exclusion. That part really sucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2014, 10:29 AM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,872,800 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I still hate that they included an exclusion because it's going to be abused.

Basically it's an NSA exclusion. That part really sucks.
Wow, way to bring down a thread. But you're right, that does suck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2014, 10:48 AM
 
1,735 posts, read 1,770,044 times
Reputation: 522
Good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top