Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Why does she have to speak English?

She understands both English and Spanish.

Harrier's cat is bilingual.
If the cat doesn't say yes, it is rape. Don't forget that Harrier, we don't want you getting in trouble.

 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 25,996,493 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
Then marry your friggin dumb cat and move on. WOW. I think I have more productive conversations with my four-year-old.
Wait!

Do you mean that Harrier and his cat should just consider ourselves married without state recognition?

Do you feel the same way about gay people who wish to "marry"?

Actually, that is a very good idea.

Government should get entirely out of the marriage business.

There can be contracts of commitment, enforceable by the courts.

Anyone can call themselves married, but the word itself would have no legal meaning.

Do you support this common sense proposal?
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 25,996,493 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
If the cat doesn't say yes, it is rape.
What is she says si?

What does rape have to with the discussion?
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 25,996,493 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
When she speaks to you in Spanish or English, let us know.
Why does speech have to matter?

Would you ban mute people from marrying?
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:46 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,668,342 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Wait!

Do you mean that Harrier and his cat should just consider ourselves married without state recognition?

Do you feel the same way about gay people who wish to "marry"?

Actually, that is a very good idea.

Government should get entirely out of the marriage business.

There can be contracts of commitment, enforceable by the courts.

Anyone can call themselves married, but the word itself would have no legal meaning.

Do you support this common sense proposal?
I thought that until it became clear to me that the word "marriage" is important, even to gay people.

Beyond that, you seem to be splitting hairs. Under your proposal is the government involved or not?
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
What is she says si?

What does rape have to with the discussion?
Well if your cat can speak Spanish to you, then I guess you can marry your cat and consummate the marriage.
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Why does speech have to matter?

Would you ban mute people from marrying?
The deaf have a language they can speak.
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 25,996,493 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
Under your proposal is the government involved or not?
Only the court system would be involved to settle contract disputes.
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:52 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by 30to66at55 View Post
No its not. Its that true heterosexuals are just not going to subject themselves to being called hateful because they voice their opinions about homosexuals.
If you must use the No True Scotsman fallacy, couldn't you at least try to, y'know, hide it a little? That there is just sloppy.
 
Old 06-25-2014, 12:53 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,668,342 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Only the court system would be involved to settle contract disputes.
So how is that different than what we have right now? The word?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top