Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-02-2014, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,222,878 times
Reputation: 2536

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You have any idea how many women died during child birth before medical intervention? What an ignorant statement!
Being pregnant is not a disease diabetes is a disease any statements other than those facts is ignorant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2014, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,222,878 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
The above post shows the simple minded irrational thinking of conservatives. Birth control is medical care.

If a woman becomes pregnant and she seeks and receives medical care is that saying pregnancy is a disease? Of course not. So a person can seek and receive medical care without having a disease. Pregnancy is an excellent example.

But again this view point that seeking birth control in the confused minds of conservatives is equating pregnancy with a disease gets to the crux of the issue, for conservatives have decided that birth control isn't proper medical care like asthma medicine.

And the question becomes why don't they see birth control as medical care?


The answer to that question gets to the ugly and disturbing woman hating/controlling belief system that is at the heart of this so called religious beliefs debate.

For conservatives birth control isn't medical care because it enables women to have sex without the consequence of pregnancy.

And conservatives desperately want to control the sexual behavior of women.


Again in 2014, conservatives don't see birth control as medical care even though birth control is medical care.

This is why conservatives insist that a woman should pay for her birth control out of pocket, even though the money that is spent on an employee's health insurance is that employee's own money.

In the minds of conservatives, birth control is all about enabling women to have consequence free immoral sex and that's not medical care so why should some religious business owner buy a health insurance policy with the employee's money that enables that employee's immoral sexual behavior?

This opens up the question for conservatives.

Why do conservatives consider an employer's morality infringed upon if that employer has to spend the employee's compensation on a health insurance policy, but the employer's morality isn't infringed upon if the employee takes their employee compensation from a paycheck and buys the same product?

Either way it is the employee's compensation being spent.
Hobby lobby employes have the right to get any bc they want . If they use their insurance they can choose 16 different types.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:02 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
It's time for woman to READ the decision and stop exploiting yourself, degrading yourself and other females.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:23 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,231,180 times
Reputation: 1224
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
It's time for woman to READ the decision and stop exploiting yourself, degrading yourself and other females.
Thank you! I am so sick of hearing how women's rights have been trampled. If you want the FOUR contraceptives that are not being offered, pull on your big girl panties and BUY IT YOURSELF!!! You can still get it by the bucketloads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:28 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,863 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Hobby lobby employes have the right to get any bc they want . If they use their insurance they can choose 16 different types.
Whatever birth control, they can or cannot get in their own health insurance policies now rests with what religious person/corporation Hobby Lobby or other religious persons/corporations like hobby lobby decide are morally acceptable.


The reality is that birth control is medical care period. It would be like Hobby Lobby saying our employee health insurance plans don't want cover this specific asthma medicine because of our religious beliefs.

And the question rational people would ask, is why is Hobby Lobby denying their employee's access to this medical care through those employee's health insurance based on their religious beliefs?

Hobby Lobby isn't a medical doctor and Hobby Lobby's religious beliefs aren't medical doctors so why are they deciding the specific asthma medicines that are allowed to be covered?

These are the questions that a company like Hobby a Lobby would face.

But because hobby lobby is denying certain types of birth control and because conservatives don't deem birth control proper medical care, conservatives won't ask those questions of Hobby Lobby like the rest of us who understand that birth control is medical care will ask.


Instead conservatives view birth control as allowing consequence free sex which to conservatives makes birth control about religious morality.

In the conservative mind set, the religious person like corporation can apply their religious morality to their employee's birth control choices in those employee's health insurance policies.


This is all wrong thinking.

And leads to the same conclusion that conservatives want to control the sexual behavior of women and are anti-birth control because conservatives don't see birth control as medical care.

And this leads conservatives to believe that access to birth control through an employee's own health insurance is up to the moral judgement of some religious person like corporation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:30 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
Hobby Lobby should have just paid the fine, I mean tax and let everyone pay for their own health insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:33 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,452,677 times
Reputation: 4243
Good for them. See what you Progressives caused with all this nonsense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,975,748 times
Reputation: 14180
"WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE!"

See how simple that is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:38 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,734,548 times
Reputation: 13868
They opted to continue offering health insurance for their employees. But for liberals it's never good enough. With this "we want it all paid for attitude" companies should just paid the fine and let the employees pay for 100% of their own health insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2014, 01:40 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,231,180 times
Reputation: 1224
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Hobby Lobby should have just paid the fine, I mean tax and let everyone pay for their own health insurance.
I thought that too. But maybe the evil corporation Hobby Lobby actually thought that throwing their employees onto the Obamacare exchanges wouldn't be fair. Amazing how this is all their fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top