Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:25 PM
 
1,806 posts, read 1,737,663 times
Reputation: 988

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
As usual, when the liberals encounter an idea they can't refute but hate anyway, they start ranting hysterically.

Help is available, you know.
Actually, that's more likely to happen with the more conservative types here. There are next to no liberals on this forum but plenty of people who claim that Obama is part of some New World Order that's trying to take over your minds with RF rays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:28 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucknow View Post
What the heck! Why should they have to pay workers at at all, Let's go back to the days of indentured workers and slavery. Would that make the RWNJs happy? I doubt it, They would have to feed and house said workers. Maybe the Nazi or the Soviet models would do. Just work those you don't like to death and kill two birds with one stone.
Wow, really?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juram View Post
I'll do one better, why should employers be involved in your healthcare at ALL? This backwards, redundant, ridiculous system of tethering people and their healthcare to their employers has long outlived its usefulness.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gen811 View Post
news flash employers are not paying for it.
the employees are.

the employees are always paying for it as it is part of the pay package.
having employers pay for it makes no difference except for tax purposes.
Valid point; therefore, I'll ask why many employers should be mandated to provide coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:31 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by remoddahouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
As usual, when the liberals encounter an idea they can't refute but hate anyway, they start ranting hysterically.

Help is available, you know.
Actually, that's more likely to happen with the more conservative types here. There are next to no liberals on this forum but plenty of people who claim that Obama is part of some New World Order that's trying to take over your minds with RF rays.
See? There goes another one!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosinante View Post
That's not much of a reply, and depending on the number of employees a business has, the response isn't even correct.
What law forces a company to provide health insurance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
In many ways yes they are. Obamacare/ACA created substantial penalties for employers that cease offering HI plans that were in place before that act came into being.

Indeed Obamacare was built upon the premise of the main working model of health insurance in the USA; employer provided plans. There simply wasn't another way without designing an expensive federally run universal healthcare scheme which many liberals and Democrats wanted but would cost dear.

If large numbers of employers cease offering health insurance and send their employees into the private market including the ACA exchanges the entire scheme will crash under the weight.
Most Obama supporters are ignorant of what is in Obamacare. Much like Ms. "Vote for the bill to find out what's in it". Some are so ignorant that they don't know that employers are forced to provide health care (depending on the number of employees or if they donated to Obama's campaign) or face fines or arrest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:36 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,107,338 times
Reputation: 7366
Employers should not be required to provide health insurance ... it is a PERK, not a right.

Furthermore, because of Obamacare the estimates are that a huge percentage (perhaps as high as 80-90%) of business will cease to offer employer provided health insurance by 2020.
Analysts predict most employer-provided insurance will disappear as ObamaCare takes hold | Fox News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:44 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
What law forces a company to provide health insurance?
Questions and Answers on Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions Under the Affordable Care Act
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
The SCOTUS ruling was clear - the government can't force insurance on either an individual or a corporation. They can tax.

In almost every case, it would be far cheaper, and perfectly legal, to drop insurance and pay the payroll tax. Corporations voluntarily choose to insure their employees because it is seen as a perk to attract employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:55 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,344,316 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
They shouldn't be.

They got into the racket because the post WW II wage ceiling nonsense wouldn't let companies use salaries to compete for employees, so they began adding in benefits to sweeten the pot. It just became a common thing, and now everyone thinks they are owed benefits with a job.
True...very true.

One of my many jobs was in a little shop making auto parts.....we were in the UAW. (low wages....but, in the union).

I was on the bargaining committee......one things we were taught was go for benefits.....dollar for dollar they were worth as much.....and would be easier to get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:11 PM
 
46,959 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29446
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Indeed Obamacare was built upon the premise of the main working model of health insurance in the USA; employer provided plans. There simply wasn't another way without designing an expensive federally run universal healthcare scheme which many liberals and Democrats wanted but would cost dear.
This. The idea of a Public Option sent the conservatives completely ape. We ended up with this silly compromise. better than before, but oh so inferior to what could have been.

As to why so many companies let themselves get entangled in health insurance, historically it provided the employers with an even better bargaining position. After all, if an unhappy employee who quits stand to lose not just a paycheck for a couple of months, but their wife's cancer medication - well, that does keep those on the floor in a useful state of submission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top