Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When did forcing a company to pay for contraceptives become a right?
It's not only a contraceptive. It has many benefits and is part of healthcare for women. Why don't companies have a problem with paying for Viagra. There are no benefits from it other than.....ok you know the obvious.
It's not only a contraceptive. It has many benefits and is part of healthcare for women. Why don't companies have a problem with paying for Viagra. There are no benefits from it other than.....ok you know the obvious.
So what?
How is it a right for someone to force a company to pay for the morning after pill?
How is it a right for someone to force a company to pay for the morning after pill?
You wouldn't need the morning after pill if you were on birth control. Your focus is the pill being nothing more than a contraception. But it is so much more to women with medical issues.
You wouldn't need the morning after pill if you were on birth control. Your focus is the pill being nothing more than a contraception. But it is so much more to women with medical issues.
You still haven't explained how it is a right for someone to be forced to pay for another persons medical care or drugs, especially when doing so violates religious principles.
It's not only a contraceptive. It has many benefits and is part of healthcare for women. Why don't companies have a problem with paying for Viagra. There are no benefits from it other than.....ok you know the obvious.
What does this have to do with a politician getting brought up on sex charges?
When did forcing a company to pay for contraceptives become a right?
When did it become a right for corporations to pay for boner pills? A corporation shouldn't have any say with what goes on between you and your doctor. If a doctor tells a woman that an IUD is best for her health, she should be able to get it without having her company second guessing her doctor.
I'm a socially liberal Democrat and I think the age of consent should certainly be lower than 18. In most states it is 16.
I don't care that it was a Democrat. I also thought the Mark Foley 'scandal' and the Catholic church 'scandal' were media-driven nonsense.
I prefer the sliding scale for consent. I think a 16 yr old should be able to consent to sex with a 19yr old, but not a 49yr old. Once they hit 18, then they are adult enough to make those bad choices.
I prefer the sliding scale for consent. I think a 16 yr old should be able to consent to sex with a 19yr old, but not a 49yr old. Once they hit 18, then they are adult enough to make those bad choices.
In Colorado, 17 is the unfettered age of consent, but for 15 and 16 year olds there is a 10 year exception (25 and 15 = legal, 26 and 15 = crime). For those under 15, there is a 4 year exception (14 and 18 = legal, 14 and 19 = crime, 14 and 10 = legal, 14 and 9 = crime).
While the media and the left-wing are whipped up into a frenzy since Hobby Lobby doesn't have to provide abortifacient drugs (which somehow equals women being stripped of their rights to get any birth control, based on what I've been hearing from easily manipulated Liberal drones), stories like this will get ignored. Though if that was an (R) behind his name, then this would suddenly be a newsworthy story.
Tell me what you Republicans are doing about convicted felon David Vitter.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.