Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just a person with common sense , I see one side claim it man made global warming when it's hot and when it is cold , seems to me that they want to argue either way
The global cult has been told what a small percentage co2 contributes to the dreaded greenhouse effect and what percent man has to do with it yet still bray on. I guess the sheep continue to baaa so to say.
You are full of crappola....James Hanson is an American adjunct professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University. Hansen is best known for his research in the field of climatology.
After graduate school, Hansen continued his work with radiative transfer models, attempting to understand the Venusian atmosphere. Later he applied and refined these models to understand the Earth's atmosphere, in particular, the effects that aerosols and trace gases have on Earth's climate. Hansen's development and use of global climate models has contributed to the further understanding of the Earth's climate. James Hansen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So should we study climate change and learn how much of an effect man has with it or should we just assume that knowledge is too vast for man to ever comprehend?
Your heroes don't want to study anything they want to tax us for it. How is stealing our money going to effect folks in China? I guess you don't really care just another kitty of money democrats want to steal and use for probably more "green" crap like the 20 bill they tossed in the stimulus hogwash.
Any reference from a real science organization or did News Busters have their own research team.
What about "irreversible collapse" and "setting new records" being used to describe the same thing do you need a "real science organization" to explain to you?
You do realize that those numbers - that "record ice" - has a smaller deviation from the norm than the warmer temperatures that have been seen globally for years now, right?
In short, whenever climate-aware people post data, the deniers ridicule it, and claim how such small deviations don't matter... then, they post about a tiny increase in Antarctic sea ice, and attempt to claim that such a thing somehow disproves climate change.
Scientists have already tested and explained this....did you miss that one?
Same "scientists" who want to steal our money to save the planet? LOL
Maybe dump some iron into the ocean or fire up some man made volcanoes. These global warming clowns worry me more about destroying the earth than any cow that's for sure.
Already know the "reasons" that scientist use to explain Antarctic sea ice growth.
Strong wind circulation
More moisture
Warmer waters
Lower salinity
Ozone
Did I miss any?
In the end they don't really know.
The top two basically explain the reasoning for more sea ice, do you not believe the studies? Care to do your own field studies to counter the studies?
Here is Rambler123's "tiny increase in Antarctic Sea Ice"
It's ONLY 2.1 million sq km above normal
Which is why GLOBAL Sea Ice is nearly 1 million sq km above normal
Considering that about 15% of the oceans are covered with ice for part of the year and there are 335,258,000 sq km total 2.1 million sq km is indeed tiny.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
