Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-16-2014, 10:25 PM
 
1,871 posts, read 2,096,767 times
Reputation: 2913

Advertisements

This is why I don't like statistics because you can manipulate them for your personal agenda. Pisses me. Don't trust statistics. Measure everyone.

 
Old 07-16-2014, 11:28 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanhawk View Post
Health survey gives government its first large-scale data on gay, bisexual population - The Washington Post

First large scale survey on orientation by the government. Another 0.7% identify as bisexual

FTA:The National Health Interview Survey, which is the government’s premier tool for annually assessing Americans’ health and behaviors, found that 1.6 percent of adults self-identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent consider themselves bisexual.

The figures offered a slightly smaller assessment of the size of the gay, lesbian and bisexual population than other surveys

The overwhelming majority of adults, 96.6 percent, labeled themselves as straight in the 2013 survey.

That 10% figure thrown around since Kinsey studies in the 1940s is pretty much bogus.
The question is, were there only two options? Because there is a huge grey area. If you have to pick one of two options, the margins aren't surprising at all. Especially with my generation, it's becoming a lot more blurred.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 12:11 AM
 
4,794 posts, read 12,370,711 times
Reputation: 8398
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
The question is, were there only two options? Because there is a huge grey area. If you have to pick one of two options, the margins aren't surprising at all. Especially with my generation, it's becoming a lot more blurred.
What other options? Necrophiliacs? Bestiality? Maybe they were the other 1.1% "unidentified" or refused to answer.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,650 posts, read 12,941,545 times
Reputation: 6381
Have you heard of the term 'closet'?

Not every homosexual will be comfortable checking the 'gay' option.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 07:35 AM
 
Location: USA
4,433 posts, read 5,343,648 times
Reputation: 4127
Does the 1.6% also include all the married men than step out with other men?
 
Old 07-17-2014, 09:35 AM
 
2,085 posts, read 2,139,509 times
Reputation: 3498
Quote:
Originally Posted by theropod View Post
Have you heard of the term 'closet'?

Not every homosexual will be comfortable checking the 'gay' option.
The issue then becomes that there are too many lying homosexuals which seems to be contributing to the rising HIV rates among straight women.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Ak-Rowdy, OH
1,522 posts, read 2,999,467 times
Reputation: 1152
Quote:
Originally Posted by soletaire View Post
The issue then becomes that there are too many lying homosexuals which seems to be contributing to the rising HIV rates among straight women.
Or lying straight men? Or lying women?
 
Old 07-17-2014, 10:23 AM
 
Location: La Jolla, CA
7,284 posts, read 16,675,136 times
Reputation: 11675
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_human_being View Post
There was one employee at Pensacola Naval Air Station who passed away from AIDS. The management told all the employees in the building that AIDS was not contagious and that they had nothing to fear. A medical team was sent to retrieve the deceased's tools and personal property. The medical team wore coveralls, masks, and gloves. Rocket science?
I wonder what infectious disease REALLY triggered that response? Guess management figured nobody was smart enough to question a biohazard team responding to what they claimed was a deceased AIDS patient, and they were right.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 10:28 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,258,424 times
Reputation: 47514
I think it's WAY higher than this, especially if you consider the closeted/occasional people.

I'd say a minimum of 10% of the people I know are gay or bisexual, and those are the ones who are openly gay. I am not making a special effort to associate with gays over straights.

When you take into account the people who "did it one time and liked it," those who are outright closeted, and those who are primarily straight, but will occasionally have a same sex relationship, I'd say you're looking at 10%.
 
Old 07-17-2014, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,814,475 times
Reputation: 35584
That figure is close to the 2 per-cent that it's always been estimated to be.

People often think the number is higher, given Americans' obsession with pop culture. Gays, not surprisingly, are attracted to the arts, so their numbers in that field, coupled with obligatory gay characters in most TV shows, help to up that perception, too.

Forget Hollyweird; it is in no way representative of America.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top