Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
representatives of the government and of the U.S. intelligence has already made a statement who fired and who ordered shoot at the plane...
That's a big issue! Yeah, they made a statement... But they LIE as usual. (After 9/11 they lie almost everytime). There is no any real proof of their loud words.
If you will understand what is point, intention and aim of the US foreign policy then you will understand why they are lying and why they're stubbornly ignoring real facts, documents and data submitted by other side.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihaike
Ukraine even have radio interceptions for the occasion.
Please provide us with a link to this fake or allegation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihaike
even supplying the East of Ukraine by weapons the Rf is fighting against civil aircraft...
You are just parroting the US govt accusation rhetoric that has no base.
Again, the RF didn't supply the rebels with the BUK system. I have already mentioned above in this thread that Putin is not an idiot to do it. If Putin would have supplied the rebels with some modern powerful weapons then the civil war would already have ended in april with the home guards victory.
You better ask yourself why there is no any real satellite images were represented that could prove the rebels used the BUK? I give you a hint - those images shows that Ukrainian army shot down the malaysian plane. http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/20...ee-in-ukraine/
The Britons have them, not the Dutch. But the UK are the US ally and there is no any garantee that the flight data would be corrected in a favour of the US proofless version. And the EU will be subserviently silent to it.
So the UK is on this too? Who else is in on the conspiracy? I just want to keep up here.
For the deniers, forget the governments and agencies involved. Here's the deal: transmissions leave lots of foot prints. Ordinary tech geeks can trace this stuff in minutes, and they did. The Russian backed rebels were caught red handed (pardon the pun).
For the deniers, forget the governments and agencies involved. Here's the deal: transmissions leave lots of foot prints. Ordinary tech geeks can trace this stuff in minutes, and they did. The Russian backed rebels were caught red handed (pardon the pun).
No, they didn't.
And needless to say that different tech geeks can make opposite to each other' conclusion. It depends from their bias. That's why we have an independent international committee of tech specialists. But there is no result from them so far.
I disagree....
SHEEP only listen to MSM crap and wont even consider THEY MIGHT BE LYING TO THEM!!
Why? Both my definition and yours have the same idea.
I was saying same thing but in other words.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
*
