Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Require that able-bodied recipients of welfare devote manual labor to infrastructure projects. Start with those receiving Obamacare subsidies.
Problem solved.
Because people collecting a government check are all of the sudden going to be good employees?
End welfare, let each state decide how to address its infrastructure needs.
Call me a pessimist if you will, but I have serious doubts that a bunch of 18-25 year olds building a bridge or highway under a "compulsory civil service" program are going to work efficiently and create a quality product.
It's how we did it in the 1930's with various public works projects. Most of those guys were under 30.
It looks like everything in your list is the responsibility of the states or privately owned.
Why should MY taxes bailout a state who squander the money they collected.
As per your example, why should the rest of the country fix NYC's problem?
When are Americans going to learn to take responsibility serious and quit relying on Uncle Sam to bail them out?
Like they say, "You own it, you fix it."
What you say is largely true, aside from some of the water works that are taken care of by the Corps of Engineers, many of our infrastructure problems are a state's or private concern. So how do we get the states to upgrade their infrastructure and why is it universally collapsing around the country?
Take the electrical grid. There are over 500 different players involved in the national grid (except for Texas) how do we get them all to cooperate and spend the small fortune that's needed to update to a "smart grid" system?
I'm looking for answers, not condemnations of the government. It seems like any infrastructure project that involves government whether it be state or federal is prone to abuse so is privatization the answer? if so, how do we turn over the reins?
.....and when it comes to a NYC sewer failure that's "not your problem", you may want to think again. If you live within 500 miles of a major city and part of it's infrastructure fails, you will feel repercussions. The failing infrastructure should be a national concern. If you think that your state (which ever that is) will remain an oasis because they have been diligent (and none of them have been) while all around, everything else slides into ruin, You better be ready to roll out the state militia to guard your borders.
At that point we might as well balkanize the entire country....................then again, that may be the only way that the US will survive into the next century anyway.
I have trouble believing in our "crumbling infrastructure". Back in the Bush years, a law was passed providing hundreds of billions in funds for infrastructure projects. Obama's administration spent nearly $1 trillion on "shovel ready" infrastructure projects. I have to believe that money was spent responsibly and that our infrastructure was fixed, as politicians from both parties promised it would be.
I mean....politicians wouldn't lie and government wouldn't just waste that money now, would they?
The infrastructure needs of the country can and should be financed off budget by the Federal Reserve directly, basically take advantage of their tremendous credit creating ability to benefit the whole country for a change.
What you say is largely true, aside from some of the water works that are taken care of by the Corps of Engineers, many of our infrastructure problems are a state's or private concern. So how do we get the states to upgrade their infrastructure and why is it universally collapsing around the country?
Take the electrical grid. There are over 500 different players involved in the national grid (except for Texas) how do we get them all to cooperate and spend the small fortune that's needed to update to a "smart grid" system?
I'm looking for answers, not condemnations of the government. It seems like any infrastructure project that involves government whether it be state or federal is prone to abuse so is privatization the answer? if so, how do we turn over the reins?
.....and when it comes to a NYC sewer failure that's "not your problem", you may want to think again. If you live within 500 miles of a major city and part of it's infrastructure fails, you will feel repercussions. The failing infrastructure should be a national concern. If you think that your state (which ever that is) will remain an oasis because they have been diligent (and none of them have been) while all around, everything else slides into ruin, You better be ready to roll out the state militia to guard your borders.
At that point we might as well balkanize the entire country....................then again, that may be the only way that the US will survive into the next century anyway.
"I'm looking for answers" The fed certainly is NOT the answer.
It is up to EACH state to take care of their own infrastructure.
Answer, VOTE in your OWN state to get rid of the crooked politicians.
And yet it works in other first-world countries, where they actually invest in their infrastructure, but through public and private entities.
So clearly we're doing something wrong, right?
This. Other nations are able to efficiently deliver on social programs, education, and universal healthcare yet in America it seems even the simplest programs become boondoggles.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.