Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Does The Militarization Of The Police Concern you
Yes 122 80.79%
No 28 18.54%
Don't Care 1 0.66%
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-15-2014, 07:09 AM
 
143 posts, read 122,156 times
Reputation: 112

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post

Got to keep the military industial complex humming along. If you can't go pick a fight overseas, pick it internally. Those humvees and 40 mm grenade launchers aren't going to sell themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-15-2014, 07:32 AM
 
195 posts, read 153,940 times
Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Seems like some Police are playing soldier just like the anti-gubment gun nuts....

The police are the government of your cities, military.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 08:00 AM
 
2,079 posts, read 4,951,646 times
Reputation: 1895
I've always believed police departments have way too much firepower and military equipment for the policing of local communities. Police departments are out of control and a real potential threat to governments. It's very scary when police departments have more military weapons and warfighting tactics than the National Guard, which is the military department responsible for responding to state emergencies.

Last edited by dorado0359; 08-15-2014 at 08:41 AM.. Reason: ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 08:26 AM
 
4,921 posts, read 7,690,051 times
Reputation: 5482
When I was a kid on the streets of one of the big three cities in the US the policeman walked a beat. He carried a night stick and a .38 cal pea shooter. His communication was a call-box that were positioned about every three city blocks. He was well respected.

Today we have police that armed to the hilt with body armor and armored personnel carriers. SWAT teams that deliver traffic summons by breaking down front doors in the middle of the night and in the process many times killing innocent people especially children. We have all seen the policeman firing indiscriminately at a fleeing van driven by a mother with four small children in the car. We have seen policeman shot and kill a retarded individual because he couldn't explain himself. Then there is the more recent choking to death of citizens all recorded on video.

Ask yourself what has happened to our police? In my childhood the police where part of society. Everyone knew Officer "O'Brien" and respected him.
The police today are not respected. They simply don't deserve respect. How can you trust an individual in full body armor and and automatic weapon ready to do battle against and elder lady with a rolling pin?

It is time to demand our legislators return America to the way it was and end this militarization of the police. On the local level, residents must demand an inventory of police equipment and eliminate all inappropriate firearms, armor, and devices that do not come under police equipment but instead are intended for military use. If you are a police personnel and don't like it then quit.

The police attitude should be to serve and protect. Not the police but the citizens. When anyone takes a police oath he/she should be prepared to lay down their lives to protect innocent civilians.
This current day attitude of protecting police personnel without regard to the safety of civilians is absolutely ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 01:36 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053
One of the biggest problems is the way police are being trained to shoot first and question later. Reasonable force requires you to identify the threat and if not being fired upon retreat to safety and contain the threat. Call for backup, identify and seek compliance from safe position. Simply to many examples where fear for safety of the office is claimed and death results for unarmed individuals. It's as if to say the shooting and loss of life, of 100 unarmed civilians, is more desirable, many times, when what is being investigated is a minor infraction of law, than the feelings of the officer. When a clear threat has not been determined the first response of deadly force is unacceptable. We all want safety, yet we know that, and get behind the wheel of automobiles where loss of life is a daily occurrence. If an officer wants safety and isn't willing to offer it to the population he is in charge to protect, then he needs to find a job he's more qualified for. Serving the public is not his calling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 02:08 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053
Firefighters would not respond to fires if their safety was first and foremost the consideration. All jobs have risk. Police work has risk but if you can't preform it accepting the risk, without killing what you can't identify, then something needs to change. The officer, in his own house, who woke in the early morning hours, grabbed his gun, to investigate a noise, saw a form and fired, shooting his own teenage daughter, should be questioning his decision and his training.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 11:25 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,861,688 times
Reputation: 12950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Actually many of them are prior military service and they do train in crowd control tactics, so your assumption is not really accurate.
Yup, there are federal grants through the DHS to train small town PD's in urban combat, usually taught by combat veterans and often former spec ops guys. That way, if the terrorists ever try to take over a few buildings in Tupelo, they won't have to wait for the county to send over a SWAT team - the same guy who sits in his cruiser with a radar gun eating Slim Jim's all day can throw on the helmet and grab the M4 in his trunk and go use his shoot-to-kill combat training to neutralize them.

The problem is that he is now trained to think like a soldier in a war zone every time he pulls over a car or responds to a noise complaint... He assumes this could be "the big one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 11:30 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,968,512 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by donsabi View Post

In my childhood the police where part of society. Everyone knew Officer "O'Brien" and respected him.
The police today are not respected. They simply don't deserve respect. How can you trust an individual in full body armor and and automatic weapon ready to do battle against and elder lady with a rolling pin?

It is time to demand our legislators return America to the way it was and end this militarization of the police. On the local level, residents must demand an inventory of police equipment and eliminate all inappropriate firearms, armor, and devices that do not come under police equipment but instead are intended for military use. If you are a police personnel and don't like it then quit.

The police attitude should be to serve and protect. Not the police but the citizens. When anyone takes a police oath he/she should be prepared to lay down their lives to protect innocent civilians.
This current day attitude of protecting police personnel without regard to the safety of civilians is absolutely ridiculous.
Great post. I recall the pd you described well today. Todays forces are spitting in the faces of the forces you have talked about, from past generations. IMO, we're getting the misfits today, the sociopaths, those who cannot get another job with like pay,those are today's police departments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2014, 11:41 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,180,466 times
Reputation: 23891
From page 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I always thought police departments were funded by localities. What changed where they can now receive federal money?

I need to look that up.
Here's the answer...

How America’s Police Became an Army: The 1033 Program

Faced with a bloated military and what it perceived as a worsening drug crisis, the 101st Congress in 1990 enacted the National Defense Authorization Act. Section 1208 of the NDAA allowed the Secretary of Defense to “transfer to Federal and State agencies personal property of the Department of Defense,

…
It was called the 1208 Program. In 1996, Congress replaced Section 1208 with Section 1033.

…
The St. Louis County Police Department’s annual budget is around $160 million. By providing law enforcement agencies with surplus military equipment free of charge, the NDAA encourages police to employ military weapons and military tactics.

  • Watertown, CT (pop. 22,514) – purchased a mine resistant vehicle costing taxpayers $733,000 for $2,800
  • Bloomington, GA (pop. 2,713) – acquired four grenade launchers

So this 1033 program is the vehicle used to militarize local police departments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2014, 01:16 AM
 
Location: Early America
3,124 posts, read 2,068,179 times
Reputation: 7867
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/statu...999425/photo/1

This is not a police state. The idea that our local police have become paramilitary forces is appalling. From a legislation stand point-- What can and should be done?

I think this is something most conservatives and liberals can agree on.
Not only has Homeland Security facilitated their purchases of military equipment, it also TRAINS LEOs in battlefield tactics. Check out dhs website sometime. I have known for nearly 4 years. Most people have been blowing it off as a conspiracy theory.

What can be done? Maybe Obama will find out about it in the news like everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top