Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petertherock
OK, this is obviously someone who is not educated. It was Klinton who failed to protect us on 9/11. It was the Klinton administration who gutted the military and intelligence budgets so we didn't have any intelligence against Al Qaeda. It was Klinton who failed to act when the World Trade Center was bombed the first time. It was Klinton who failed to act when the Marines barracks were attacked, it was Klinton who failed to act when the Cole was bombed. .
HOGWASH!
Attempting to play both sides of the fence is HOGWASH!
As I've said, if Bush is to labeled as a protector the question must be asked: Why did he FAIL to be a protector on 9/11?
Try to keep up with the situation and learn WHO was in the White House on 9/11 and stop the delusion that when things are good it's him and when things go to crap it's someone else.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petertherock
Bush had the courage to fight a real war on terror and because of this war we have the terrorists on the run in Iraq and Afghanistan instead of bombing more buildings in the USA. .
Bombings in Spain and England don't count? I guess they're just our allies, nobody important, right?
Maybeif Bush had gone after the real enemy with the same fervor he pursued his personal bete noire those bombings wouldn't have happened.
If Bush is so great how come neither McCain, Romney, or Rudy wants him campaigning for them?
Am I the only one that finds it odd that Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Huckabee, Thompson, Hunter are all running on basically the same stances as Bush (with the possible exception of immigration) yet none invoke his name? Usually if a candidate is running on roughly the same platform or with the same stances and positions, they will bend over backwards trying to snag the most important endorsement of all, that of the standing President.
Many also said that about Abe Lincoln and Harry Truman. Not now, but back then.
True, depends on how history perverts the facts. If high school history books ignore violations of liberty as they have for Lincoln, perhaps Bush will go down as one of the greatest.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
