Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It would also be consistent with the police statement. Why don't we see what comes out instead of convicting someone based on media reports?
The fun part is watching these nutters go from wanting the cop convicted for something they felt certain of, to these ridiculous what-ifs. It's all they've got left.
The fun part is watching these nutters go from wanting the cop convicted for something they felt certain of, to these ridiculous what-ifs. It's all they've got left.
Indeed. All the theories are seen as fact (even when they have to adjust to new "facts") as long as they end up with the officer guilty.
The fun part is watching these nutters go from wanting the cop convicted for something they felt certain of, to these ridiculous what-ifs. It's all they've got left.
That's what this whole thread is because we don't have enough FACTS to make a case either way.
The fun part is watching these nutters go from wanting the cop convicted for something they felt certain of, to these ridiculous what-ifs. It's all they've got left.
And what evidence do you have that the cop had to use lethal force?
Your argument is no more credible or nuttier than anyone else.
What is credible is that a cop killed an unarmed 18 year old with two lethal shots to the head.
And what evidence do you have that the cop had to use lethal force?
Your argument is no more credible or nuttier than anyone else.
What is credible is that a cop killed an unarmed 18 year old with two lethal shots to the head.
The cop has every right to use lethal force if he was attacked by Brown & feared for his life. IF that happened, you would agree he had every right to shoot correct?
And what evidence do you have that the cop had to use lethal force?
- the cop's version of events that so far have not been proven incorrect by anything released so far.
- the numerous witnesses, including Johnson, who were proven to be lying by the physical evidence so far, which removes any credibility they have regarding this incident.
- the injury to the cop.
- and again, no evidence so far presented has refuted anything about the cop's version of events.
I have to 100% agree here. Now its not judgement on the cop shooting itself. Its almost incidental. It doesn't really matter.
How can you have a police force with a population that is 2/3 African american have less than 10% of your workforce (around 5 officers) African American. Look at the arrest rates. . ridiculous.
The issue here isn't the spark that caused this fire to catch. Ferguson administration is flawed and not representative of the people it is helping. This causes HUGE issues.
The witness that said "he was shot....and kept coming at the officer. Shot again and kept coming at the officer"
If you are ordered to freeze, and you keep coming forward, you can be shot to be incapacitated. If you are shot and still keep coming forward? Dead.
End of story. 4 shots to the arm to incapacitate, you don't keep coming forward from a head shot. The witness in the video post shooting said "he kept coming at the officer".
This kid wrote his own death certificate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
