How long do you think it'll take for American society to oppose male genital mutiliation? (state, doctor)

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

I don't understand what your point is. It's not illegal to circumcise your child. I am saying that it should be.

How about you take a second and comprehend my post instead of simply typing what you want.

Im not saying that to be mean, I am just honestly not sure if you are trolling or if you skipped a word in my post because it is clear what what i am asking.


In your post, you asked why is this being left up to legislators, You seemed to have been arguing that circumcision is a legal obligation that parents must follow.

I asked you to provide evidence to this.

If im wrong, simply say that isnt what you meant.

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

How about you take a second and comprehend my post instead of simply typing what you want.

Im not saying that to be mean, I am just honestly not sure if you are trolling or if you skipped a word in my post because it is clear what what i am asking.


In your post, you asked why is this being left up to legislators, You seemed to have been arguing that circumcision is a legal obligation that parents must follow.

I asked you to provide evidence to this.

If im wrong, simply say that isnt what you meant.

I'm unsure of your position. I think you're trying to play word games. Do you think it's a man's right to retain the foreskin on his genitals or not? What is your position?

[Ceece]

I don't think it's necessary but I see no reason to make it illegal and make people criminals either.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by PoppySead

Unless you're Jewish you can choose to copy them or not.

Of course I think you mean when are we going to stop allowing parents to whack off Johnny's little wanner. I do hope soon, I feel sorry for guys it's not cool at all. You grow up and realize, hey, this could've felt even better than this.

Circumcision only chops off a small layer of skin just below the "head", not the penis itself.

Also,t hat feeling this is a lie.

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by Ceece

I don't think it's necessary but I see no reason to make it illegal and make people criminals either.

So you believe that women should be able to determine whether or not men should keep the foreskins on their genitals, but that men should not tell women what to do with their fetuses?

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

I'm unsure of your position. I think you're trying to play word games. Do you think it's a man's right to retain the foreskin on his genitals or not? What is your position?

I never stated a position, because that wasnt the point of my post, nor was it the point of the section I quoted, so please, answer my question.

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

Circumcision only chops off a small layer of skin just below the "head", not the penis itself.

Also,t hat feeling this is a lie.

So you don't support a man's right to choose whether or not they should keep the foreskin on their genitals? You believe that it is a third-party's right to make that decision for the male who has no say in the matter?

[Mr. Maryland]

I get the OP's point, it should be the guys choice when he is of age to decide.

I'd like to have had that choice.

[Ceece]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

So you believe that women should be able to determine whether or not men should keep the foreskins on their genitals, but that men should not tell women what to do with their fetuses?

Do you believe their fathers can determine that? If not then why are you asking this pointless question about women and abortion?

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

So you believe that women should be able to determine whether or not men should keep the foreskins on their genitals, but that men should not tell women what to do with their fetuses?

Do you have proof it is women doing it? is there some poll from a good source ?