Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-28-2014, 06:14 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,024,034 times
Reputation: 2521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Only newish thing on that is the company who owned the service that this ear witness used did confirm a video call/conference was made around the time of the shooting.
Glide is the company.

Company: Audio captured at time of Brown shooting - CNN.com

The revelation from Glide appears to bolster a man's claim that he inadvertently recorded audio of gunfire at the time a police officer shot and killed the 18-year-old Brown in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson on August 9.
The video was created at 12:02:14 p.m. that day, Glide said.

Strange backdrop for the content of his conversation to that girl - in any case.

So does that mean Wilson waited a total of 5 minutes, before calling in the shooting?
According to police logs, the county police received a report of the shooting at 12:07 PM.

 
Old 08-28-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,837 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535
There is no way to prove those are the gun shots imho and I don't think any court would admit this as evidence.
 
Old 08-28-2014, 06:34 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,024,034 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
There is no way to prove those are the gun shots imho and I don't think any court would admit this as evidence.
IF it can be verified, I do not see why it could not be admitted as evidence but
both sides would try to use it to their own advantage anyways. Kind of cancel each other out.

Shots - Hesitation - more shots - suspect is still coming at officer
Shots - Hesitation - more shots - suspect no longer a threat but officer still shooting
 
Old 08-28-2014, 07:14 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,359,408 times
Reputation: 11539
Or, because of poor vision......missed with the first few shots.

If so.....those bullets are somewhere.
 
Old 08-28-2014, 07:29 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,024,034 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
Or, because of poor vision......missed with the first few shots.

If so.....those bullets are somewhere.
poor vision because of orbital eye socket fracture....

Can't see and shooting - bystanders on a busy street during the day in danger of being hit IMO.
 
Old 08-28-2014, 07:31 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,359,408 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
poor vision because of orbital eye socket fracture....

Can't see and shooting - bystanders on a busy street during the day in danger of being hit IMO.
Yes....and he knew that.....so the little hesitation as he repositioned....then shot some more.
 
Old 08-29-2014, 07:23 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,954 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
poor vision because of orbital eye socket fracture....

Can't see and shooting - bystanders on a busy street during the day in danger of being hit IMO.
Again... just more pure speculation without any facts.
 
Old 08-29-2014, 07:53 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,635,782 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Again... just more pure speculation without any facts.
The majority of people have been making judgements on this situation with very little facts from the beginning; however, it was the looters who caused actual damage based on this lack of facts.
 
Old 08-29-2014, 09:50 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,249,837 times
Reputation: 4985
Is it true that when the Shoe store was looted that not one pair of work boots were taken by the looters?
 
Old 08-29-2014, 10:04 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,755,378 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Is it true that when the Shoe store was looted that not one pair of work boots were taken by the looters?
WORK boots That's what is being reported and yes on MSNBC too. Not one pair of work boots was stolen. Is anyone surprises?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top