Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-31-2014, 11:30 AM
 
226 posts, read 255,498 times
Reputation: 150

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Actually most instructors said that he should have had his hand on her right arm supporting the gun as it pulled up to the left. Have not seen one who said the guy was doing everything right. Most said he was not.
Most instructors wouldn't have been right on top of or touching someone firing live ammunition.

It breaks basic rules of sweeping and muzzle awareness. How can you be safe when you are all up on someones ass like that or anywhere near their muzzle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2014, 11:35 AM
 
226 posts, read 255,498 times
Reputation: 150
^^^^^



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8VhtHYTo3A
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 01:29 PM
 
46,450 posts, read 27,328,200 times
Reputation: 11181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
It is very important to you that you be right--ok--got it.
LOL....once again, how many children have shot that same rifle....with nothing happening, except the experience of a life time?

If nothing would have happened, nobody would know about it...

That is where you fail to realize this happens more often than you care to even think about (children shooting guns like this, with NOTHING happening).

It's not about being right or wrong, this family jumped through the hoops that the anti gunners stated should happen.....why can you not accept that...

Next....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 01:33 PM
 
46,450 posts, read 27,328,200 times
Reputation: 11181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Actually most instructors said that he should have had his hand on her right arm supporting the gun as it pulled up to the left. Have not seen one who said the guy was doing everything right. Most said he was not. According to the 'gun enthusiasts' if he did everything right, this would not have happened. Unless of course, guns have a mind of their own and do in fact kill people.
HOLY CRAP....you may have FINALLY realized what the problem was.....

And then you make the last 13 words of your statement.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 02:16 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,588,281 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by G2D2 View Post
Most instructors wouldn't have been right on top of or touching someone firing live ammunition.

It breaks basic rules of sweeping and muzzle awareness. How can you be safe when you are all up on someones ass like that or anywhere near their muzzle?
The fact is that there is NO acknowledged acceptable practice for nine year olds or even diminutive people. It's left to the discretion and common sense to dictate.

Much like what would occur for a person confined to a wheelchair with a degenerative muscle disease who desires to shoot.

The practice would need to be defined carefully for all contingencies such as weapons ballistics, rate of fire, arm/hand strength, a whole retinue of information would need compiling to design and format a formal policy for every contingency. There is no such formal guideline existing in range or training protocols.

Who or what organization running courses to certify firearms instructors would anticipate the need to run an example of safe instruction for a nine year old girl firing a fully-auto SMG.

"Well gentlemen today we will move on to the safe instruction method for training of 4 year olds on the 1942 model of the PIAT launcher; firstly have your student lie down on his/her back and put feet on combination cocking stirrup shoulder pad, then............"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 02:24 PM
 
46,450 posts, read 27,328,200 times
Reputation: 11181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
The fact is that there is NO acknowledged acceptable practice for nine year olds or even diminutive people. It's left to the discretion and common sense to dictate.
FACT? LOL....how did they get permission to allow children to do this in the first place? Do you think the range did not have insurance, the range just went out on it's own...lol..keep thinking.....

So, the parents did not do this? How many other children have done this exact thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Much like what would occur for a person confined to a wheelchair with a degenerative muscle disease who desires to shoot.
Yep, and if people/guardians thought it was acceptable and achievable and they had the PROPER INSTRUCTORS....oh wait..

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
The practice would need to be defined carefully for all contingencies such as weapons ballistics, rate of fire, arm/hand strength, a whole retinue of information would need compiling to design and format a formal policy for every contingency. There is no such formal guideline existing in range or training protocols.
How do you base this information that you have provided? Go ahead, lets see a link....we will wait.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Who or what organization running courses to certify firearms instructors would anticipate the need to run an example of safe instruction for a nine year old girl firing a fully-auto SMG.
Evidently they had to ask permission to do this, all those parents thought it was acceptable (you know, who issued a permit)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
"Well gentlemen today we will move on to the safe instruction method for training of 4 year olds on the 1942 model of the PIAT launcher; firstly have your student lie down on his/her back and put feet on combination cocking stirrup shoulder pad, then............"
LOL...another great example of a anti gunner who goes to the extreme....great job...not really, but as long as it makes you feel better....


Again, how many other children have shot that same style of weapon?

Why does everyone SKIRT this question ^^^^^^^

We know the answer, you anti gunners just refuse to answer it....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,346,830 times
Reputation: 19954
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
HOLY CRAP....you may have FINALLY realized what the problem was.....

And then you make the last 13 words of your statement.....
You have no sense of humor or irony do you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 03:12 PM
 
46,450 posts, read 27,328,200 times
Reputation: 11181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
You have no sense of humor or irony do you?

Because you have done so well, in your mind, presenting humor and irony during this conversation....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Beautiful NNJ
1,329 posts, read 1,456,202 times
Reputation: 1828
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Again, how many other children have shot that same style of weapon?

Why does everyone SKIRT this question ^^^^^^^

We know the answer, you anti gunners just refuse to answer it....
So what is the answer? What I'm not sure of is why we should care. The fact that something can be done without bloodshed is not a defense to introducing deadly weapons to children as a "fun" thing to do. It is morally wrong, not just stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2014, 03:15 PM
 
46,450 posts, read 27,328,200 times
Reputation: 11181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanderling View Post
So what is the answer? What I'm not sure of is why we should care. The fact that something can be done without bloodshed is not a defense to introducing deadly weapons to children as a "fun" thing to do. It is morally wrong, not just stupid.
Do your children ride bikes? Do they swim? Do they ride in a car?

Those are much more dangerous than what this thread is about...

LOL @ the bloodshed comment...

Is riding a motorcycle at 4 agreeable with you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top