Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:30 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,676,201 times
Reputation: 4254

Advertisements

The statists, want to federalize all local and state police forces. So typical.


National Progressives Want A “Federal Czar” To Oversee Local Police Forces

WASHINGTON — A coalition of unions, members of Congress, progressive groups and others wrote a joint letter to President Barack Obama calling for drastic changes to local police forces around the country after the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

The letter, which was distributed via an ad in the Washington Post, calls for a demilitarization of police forces, an effort to increase diversity, and the establishment of a “federal czar” to promote “the professionalization of local law enforcement.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:36 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Of course. The never ending Totalitarian push to nationalize everything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:38 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,958,335 times
Reputation: 2326
There's a fair number of police departments already under federal consent decrees. There needs to be some level of professionalization and definitely needs to be demilitarization, which was allowed and funded by the feds. So how is this proposal any more statist than the status quo?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:40 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
So how is this proposal any more statist than the status quo?
Think about that one for a bit and get back to us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Cities, counties and states would save a bundle if they nationalize all police.
All LE becomes Fed and act like the FBI, CIA, etc.
Then DHS can just hand out the bearcats and all other military gear and not have to worry about "grants".
Make Holder head of all the LE and they take orders from him.

Then all pay and benefits become taxpayer responsibilities.
And Holder could make sure that all LE's are diverse.

Sure..it would work out just fine and dandy wouldn't it ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Default A letter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
The statists, want to federalize all local and state police forces. So typical.


National Progressives Want A “Federal Czar” To Oversee Local Police Forces

WASHINGTON — A coalition of unions, members of Congress, progressive groups and others wrote a joint letter to President Barack Obama calling for drastic changes to local police forces around the country after the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

The letter, which was distributed via an ad in the Washington Post, calls for a demilitarization of police forces, an effort to increase diversity, and the establishment of a “federal czar” to promote “the professionalization of local law enforcement.”

yawn...

Get back to me when some legislation hits the floor for a vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
The statists, want to federalize all local and state police forces. So typical.


National Progressives Want A “Federal Czar” To Oversee Local Police Forces

WASHINGTON — A coalition of unions, members of Congress, progressive groups and others wrote a joint letter to President Barack Obama calling for drastic changes to local police forces around the country after the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

The letter, which was distributed via an ad in the Washington Post, calls for a demilitarization of police forces, an effort to increase diversity, and the establishment of a “federal czar” to promote “the professionalization of local law enforcement.”
We do not need the local police department governed by Washington, not even sure it would be Constitutional to do so.

Each individual law enforcement agency at the State and Local levels should determine their own needs when it comes to military style equipment what may be a need in LA will not be the same as what is needed in Billings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:49 AM
 
45,579 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23888
Never let a crisis go to waste...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:50 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,676,201 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
There's a fair number of police departments already under federal consent decrees. There needs to be some level of professionalization and definitely needs to be demilitarization, which was allowed and funded by the feds. So how is this proposal any more statist than the status quo?
Are you so sure the so called 'militarization' of police departments was not intended for, or used for calling for federal intervention?

I can hear the statists in the federal government now, telling us how they need to save us from the 'militarization' of police departments after the feds militarized those police departments in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:50 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,958,335 times
Reputation: 2326
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Think about that one for a bit and get back to us.
I'm not agreeing that police agencies should be federalized, and neither is this proposal really. What I'm saying is that local police departments have failed to maintain any real internal oversight and thus there are many already under federal scrutiny via consent decrees. At the same time the police have been gifted with military grade equipment from the feds. The states need to step up and institute some professionalism guidelines. Otherwise the feds will have to because that camel's nose is already in the tent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top