Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A vulnerable group? Wtf, are you crazy? Sandusky was vulnerable?, all those priests were vulnerable? What they did is disgusting, and gross, they took a child's innocence and they're vulnerable.
Convicted sex offenders are absolutely a vulnerable group--vulnerable to vigilantism, a degree of police harassment that would cause riots if applied to any other group, and often an inability to find a place to live or work.
"It's gross" is not a very sophisticated argument. And the notion that every sex offense results in a traumatized victim is preposterously unsupported by any evidence.
Quote:
Dr Bradley in Delaware raped infants and toddlers, what about them?
Convicted sex offenders are absolutely a vulnerable group--vulnerable to vigilantism, a degree of police harassment that would cause riots if applied to any other group, and often an inability to find a place to live or work.
"It's gross" is not a very sophisticated argument. And the notion that every sex offense results in a traumatized victim is preposterously unsupported by any evidence.
What about them?
Let's send any of these guys that believe in this theory to prison in general population for say 60 days. Send them to prison as child sex offenders, and then let them write a story on their experiences when they get out. If they are not traumatized then I think the story has some validity.
What about the infants, I guess its the infants fault and they should be stoned for enticing the Dr.
Let's send any of these guys that believe in this theory to prison in general population for say 60 days. Send them to prison as child sex offenders, and then let them write a story on their experiences when they get out. If they are not traumatized then I think the story has some validity.
Can you elaborate on what great insight the general population of a prison has that is eluding social scientists and psychotherapists?
Quote:
I guess its the infants fault and they should be stoned for enticing the Dr.
Talk show host Rick Roberts, co-creator of the Amber Alert system, and Melissa Hamilton, a visiting criminal law scholar at the University of Houston Law Center, joined Ed Berliner on "MidPoint" on Newsmax TV Wednesday to discuss her claim that the assumption that sex offenders are at a high risk of committing repeat offenses is a myth.
Let's have them babysit his grandchildren then. I am sure everything will be okay.
Ask a liberal to practice what they preach and you will understand that libs make rules for others, not themselves. This is why fascism and systems of monarchies are so appealing to liberals.
This isn't really news to anyone who makes it their business to follow such things. Eric Lotke and others demolished the myth of high sex offender recidivism as far back as the late 1990s. The question is, when will legislators begin to catch up to reality?
In America, taking away peoples' rationale for hating some vulnerable group is like taking away a dog's favorite chew toy.
Sex offenders prey on the vulnerable. And no I'm not talking about the guy who moons someone, or pees in public, or as a prank goes streaking. I'm talking about the low life scumbags like rapists, and pedophiles! I'm pretty laid back when it comes to the idea of giving second chances, but like with murderers I have no sympathy for people who commit those acts, and they deserve whatever they get.
Convicted sex offenders are absolutely a vulnerable group--vulnerable to vigilantism, a degree of police harassment that would cause riots if applied to any other group, and often an inability to find a place to live or work.
"It's gross" is not a very sophisticated argument. And the notion that every sex offense results in a traumatized victim is preposterously unsupported by any evidence.
What about them?
Perhaps the convicted sex offender should have thought about the repercussions prior to committing such a heinous act, no? There is absolutely NO justification for trying to have sex with children!!! NONE!!!
Perhaps the convicted sex offender should have thought about the repercussions prior to committing such a heinous act, no? There is absolutely NO justification for trying to have sex with children!!! NONE!!!
Justification is not being debated, what is sound public policy is being debated.
Let's have them babysit his grandchildren then. I am sure everything will be okay.
Ask a liberal to practice what they preach and you will understand that libs make rules for others, not themselves. This is why fascism and systems of monarchies are so appealing to liberals.
What evidence do you have that these people are "liberals", other than they said something you don't like?
Are you capable of having any conversation without throwing in your favorite word? I had pasta for dinner last night. Was it liberal pasta?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is absolutely NO justification for trying to have sex with children!!! NONE!!!
