Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-28-2014, 06:26 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,287,224 times
Reputation: 5194

Advertisements

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/08/...p-to-bottom-2/

This article points out some serious flaws in the current system of plea bargaining.
Not that it lets criminals off too light, but that it helps to convict innocent people of crimes they did not commit.
Give it a read and let me know what you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2014, 11:53 PM
 
Location: Atlantis
3,016 posts, read 3,909,526 times
Reputation: 8867
I have always said - If a prosecutor thinks he has enough evidence to charge someone with a crime:

He should be required as part of his job to take the case to trial - period.

Many defendants (guilty and innocent) have public defenders that pressure them to take a plea bargain and knowing enough about how the system works and the inadequate defense they have, they decide to take the plea bargain.

Those with money, are often strained to the point of bankruptcy before a case even gets to trial and when faced with the option of a plea bargain often take it because they have an attorney charging between $240 - 300 and hour and they lack the resources to survive a trial. Or worse, they go to trial, while expending all of their available resources and have a hung jury and/or a mistrial and are facing the same charge again at another trial, only having spent most of their money during round one.

Most convictions occur at the point of jury selection. Both the defense attorney and the prosecutor if each one has enough experience in courtrooms knows what the outcome of a trial will be based on jury selection. Which is why so many prosecutors that are absolute cowards (once again regardless of whether or not the defendant is guilty or innocent), will put a plea bargain on the table after jury selection if they think things are not going to go their way and/or even prior if they lack the balls to even go all the way.

The plea bargain system is a way for criminal courts to abstain from their duty to bring someone to trial, while offering something just to get a conviction, although with a lesser charge and not as much time. It in and of itself is criminal.

www.chasingjustice.com

Kerry Max Cook (see above link) spent 23 years on death row in a Texas prison and prior to an appeals trial, the prosecution offered him a deal for credit for time served if he just plead guilty.

Cleared a few years later due to DNA evidence and prosecutorial misconduct which included suppressing evidence and ignoring links that led to the person that was actually guilty of the crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top