Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-29-2014, 03:27 PM
 
433 posts, read 290,706 times
Reputation: 87

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Bull. Stop trying to convince yourself that the corrupt perspectives you prefer are anything other than self-centered. Stop working so hard to rationalize the callous disregard for those most vulnerable in society that your attitudes and perspectives reflect.
Really? our views or "corrupt"? Coming from a side that has wasted $22,000,000,000,000 on the War on Poverty...With nothing to show but more poverty.

Self contentedness is a great thing, why should your life not be the center of your attention and actions?

Stop working so hard to rationalize failure after failure. How is it "callous disregard" to take care of yourself first and last? No no one else will ever have as much vast interest in your life as yourself.

You know they have been the "most vulnerable in society" for the last 50 years...And your programs and polices have not lifted them or helped them one bit..

We get it, we have a logic based system and all you have is emotionalism and opinionism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2014, 04:22 PM
 
76 posts, read 57,692 times
Reputation: 72
What is wrong with retail/service being paid a "liveable" wage?


Nothing is wrong with it at all.

If you want to pay your workers a "liveable" wage, go right ahead and do so. You will get no objections from anyone, I'm sure. Just write the checks and hand them out. No one is stopping you.

Oh, by the way... you might also ask, "What is wrong with using government coercion to force others to pay a higher wage that exceeds the benefit to the company of their employees' work?"

Of course, everything is wrong with that. But it's not what you asked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 01:53 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,272,347 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
Well, if everyone goes into those degrees then another degree will become in high demand. That's kind of how markets work.

That was not the point the point is there is not degrees for everyone so which degree is in demand will not matter if there are millions of people qualified for jobs with only thousands of openings.

And you fail to mention that +/- 140,000,000 make more than minimum wage.It also does not say how many people were making just above min wage.



What, now you want to stop companies from paying "just above" minimum wage? Stop moving the goal posts.

When did I ever say that you are just spouting nonsense. I pointed out the numbers about who makes min wage have to be taken in context because it is not account for those who are still poor but make over min wage.



What bunch of companies? Once again, 3.3% of the US work force is making minimum wage or less. This means that 96.7% of the people in the work force are making more than minimum wage.

It does not say how much more above. You could be making .1 more then min wage and be part of the 96.7%.

It's not my fault that you missed economics class. I would try to explain it to you, but if you can't even figure out that raising labor costs will cause prices to go up then I highly doubt that such terms as "Gross Profit Margins" and "What the Market Will Bear" will mean anything to you.
Okay so explain to me how min wage has not gone up much through the years yet prices keep rising? You do know that labor is not always what makes prices go up. What proof do you have that min wage increase will increase prices greatly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 02:04 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalboy14844 View Post
What is wrong with retail/service being paid a "liveable" wage?


Nothing is wrong with it at all.

If you want to pay your workers a "liveable" wage, go right ahead and do so. You will get no objections from anyone, I'm sure. Just write the checks and hand them out. No one is stopping you.

Oh, by the way... you might also ask, "What is wrong with using government coercion to force others to pay a higher wage that exceeds the benefit to the company of their employees' work?"

Of course, everything is wrong with that. But it's not what you asked.

What is wrong with using government coercion to inflate the quality and cost of housing and thereby force others to pay a higher rent that exceeds the quality level desired?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 02:36 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Eagle View Post
Okay so explain to me how min wage has not gone up much through the years yet prices keep rising? You do know that labor is not always what makes prices go up. What proof do you have that min wage increase will increase prices greatly?
actually min wage has bben increased many times and has kept up with inflation for the most part


here is the ACTUAL historical min wage chart, form the ACTUAL government (DOL (dept of labor)
http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/chart.htm


here is the ACTUAL todays dollar calculator from the ACTUAL government (BLS (bureau of labor and statistics )
Inflation Calculator: Bureau of Labor Statistics


as you can see in 1938 the min wage was .38 (38 cents)...in todays dollars it is 6.42 (as of 17 aug 2014)

as you can see in 1950 the min wage was .75 (75 cents for those that don't understand decimals) in todays dollars it is 7.42

as you can see in 1984 the min wage was 3.35 in todays dollars that is 7.68




btw the min wage only effects about 1% of the working population


now if you look at median household wage
median annual household income 1970 ..... $7600
median annual household income 2013.....$51,000

big jump and progress since 1970

min wage is for unskilled

federal min wage should be zero, because one size does not fit all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 06:23 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
actually min wage has bben increased many times and has kept up with inflation for the most part


here is the ACTUAL historical min wage chart, form the ACTUAL government (DOL (dept of labor)
http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/chart.htm


here is the ACTUAL todays dollar calculator from the ACTUAL government (BLS (bureau of labor and statistics )
Inflation Calculator: Bureau of Labor Statistics


as you can see in 1938 the min wage was .38 (38 cents)...in todays dollars it is 6.42 (as of 17 aug 2014)

as you can see in 1950 the min wage was .75 (75 cents for those that don't understand decimals) in todays dollars it is 7.42

as you can see in 1984 the min wage was 3.35 in todays dollars that is 7.68




btw the min wage only effects about 1% of the working population


now if you look at median household wage
median annual household income 1970 ..... $7600
median annual household income 2013.....$51,000


big jump and progress since 1970

min wage is for unskilled

federal min wage should be zero, because one size does not fit all

Minimum wage typically lags behind CPI, and is belatedly adjusted to catch up to CPI. As soon as a minimum wage increase takes effect, it starts to again lag behind the increasing CPI.

Even so, CPI fails to adequately track the actual inflation experienced by low-wage workers, what with energy and food being not included.

Median household income is not median household wage; median income includes a number of income sources other than wages and thus is not representative of wage slaves who have no other sources of income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 07:17 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,700,286 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
Really? our views or "corrupt"?
Yes. Placing the comfort and luxury of those who are able to pay their own ways over the basic human needs of those who cannot is immoral. Those of you who abide such corrupt attitudes need to stop evading the righteous repudiation of that which you support.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
Self contentedness is a great thing, why should your life not be the center of your attention and actions?
Not to the exclusion of behaving in a humane manner toward others. Not the exclusion of acknowledging society's obligation with regard to the basic needs of all its members. You are free to rationalize selfishness however you wish, but that doesn't make it any less than a rationalization and doesn't make it any less morally offensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
How is it "callous disregard" to take care of yourself first and last?
The fact that you have the gall to ask indicates that no amount of ethical instruction directed at you in this thread will help you see the indefensible nature of the foundation of what you believe. Hopefully, the bald-faced egoism in your comments will strike others in a manner that they'll realize the true nature of the path you're peddling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
You know they have been the "most vulnerable in society" for the last 50 years...And your programs and polices have not lifted them or helped them one bit..
Lying to yourself may insulate yourself from the moral repudiation of what you believe, which I've provided, but it doesn't actually obviate the reality. Those most vulnerable in society are still better off today than they were fifty years ago, the "success" your corrupt, self-serving claptrap has had over the last thirty-five years, notwithstanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
We get it, we have a logic based system and all you have is emotionalism and opinionism.
What you promote is a selfishness based system. Cold, calculating, heartless. What we promote is a human system. Humane, compassionate, balanced, honorable, and moral.

Last edited by bUU; 09-30-2014 at 07:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 07:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Liberals recognize that the hardships of reality is no excuse for behaving in an offensively selfish manner
There is nothing more selfish than bearing child after child which one has insufficient means to support.

Meanwhile, those who actually DO have to support themselves have a birth rate that is only 1/3 that of the selfish takers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 08:08 AM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,740,370 times
Reputation: 1336
Raising minimum wage increases costs to business, which increases the cost of products/services, which devalues everyone's buying power through "inflation".

The feel-good arbitrary "raise" provides no more buying power than existed before the "raise." And everyone who doesn't get a proportional "raise" to cover the "inflation" actually gets an arbitrary cut in their standard of living. It is a silly smoke and mirror scam in which no one benefits in the least except the State which may see a slight rise in revenue from taxation of all of the increased circulation of devalued dollars...At best it is a system of extortion which benefits no one but the tax collectors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 08:19 AM
 
2,154 posts, read 4,424,138 times
Reputation: 2170
If any of y'all ain't happy with your wages, well, remember you accepted the job when it was offered to you, in which you had the opportunity to be provided with the rate of pay for the duties you would be performing. Don't like what you are paid at your job, well, then leave it and look for work elsewhere or improve your skill sets so you are a better asset to your employer.

Min. wage needs to go away completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top