Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-13-2016, 10:51 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,319,675 times
Reputation: 7627

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DorianRo View Post
Well you couldn't really get any lower than Bush and his cronies so I guess a success if only a minuscule one.

If you consider all the hype of how great Obummer was going to be back in 2008 then a big time failure
Considering that Obama's approval rating is about the same as Reagans was at this point in his presidency - and wayyyyyyyy above that of Bush at this stage - it appears the American people disagree with your assessment.



Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2016, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Absolute unmitigated total DISASTER
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2016, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Absolute unmitigated total DISASTER
Care to elaborate? This is a debate forum not an opinion poll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Care to elaborate? This is a debate forum not an opinion poll.

Says who? You?


The title of this thread was simple, and therefore so was my answer.
If you want to figure out why, do some research, and start with the 19 Trillion in debt that this country now has. And then keep going.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 11:01 AM
 
29,531 posts, read 9,700,562 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
Says who? You?

The title of this thread was simple, and therefore so was my answer.
If you want to figure out why, do some research, and start with the 19 Trillion in debt that this country now has. And then keep going.
You have got a point. The OP did ask for a simple response, no real explanation, but if you look through what follows in this thread even a little, you will see the result is nothing but comments like yours either supportive of Obama or not, the result of which is what?

For those of us who might be a little more interested in the "why" behind these comments rather than the simple thumbs up or down, comments like yours have no value. On the other hand, I suppose all the comments that offer the "why" of their opinion are perhaps of no value to you either...

I posted an opinion contrary to yours in my comment #1592 that you might like to review (rather than the entire thread), or not of course..., up to you.

PS: If you want us to start with the 19T debt when it comes to Obama, you might want to start with when that debt started and how it got to be a national concern even before Obama took office, and then those circumstances when Obama did take office. Just saying...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 07:02 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,687,867 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by LearnMe View Post

PS: If you want us to start with the 19T debt when it comes to Obama, you might want to start with when that debt started and how it got to be a national concern even before Obama took office, and then those circumstances when Obama did take office. Just saying...
The debt was a concern when Obama took office, yes. But he didn't seem concerned and it just soared Pollyanna fashion...with neither party willing to reign it in. The buck stops where? With Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 07:07 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,737,277 times
Reputation: 1721
Definitive answer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
The debt was a concern when Obama took office, yes. But he didn't seem concerned and it just soared Pollyanna fashion...with neither party willing to reign it in. The buck stops where? With Obama.
When Obama took office the country was losing 800,000 jobs a month. That was the priority, not trying to reduce the debt.

What was the cause of the debt in 2009? The government lost $500 billion in revenue due to the severe recession and automatic safety net programs, such as unemployment benefits, kicked in.

What should the government have done in 2009, raise taxes or cut benefits just when the unemployed needed those benefits the most?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Self explanatory
12,601 posts, read 7,219,689 times
Reputation: 16799
Nvm, wrong thread. Damn mobile posting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2016, 01:01 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,247,595 times
Reputation: 27861
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
When Obama took office the country was losing 800,000 jobs a month. That was the priority, not trying to reduce the debt.

What was the cause of the debt in 2009? The government lost $500 billion in revenue due to the severe recession and automatic safety net programs, such as unemployment benefits, kicked in.

What should the government have done in 2009, raise taxes or cut benefits just when the unemployed needed those benefits the most?
OK. You've got a point there. And I can agree that in order to avoid a depression, you had to spend in 2009.


What about 2010?
What about 2011?
What about 2012?
What about 2013?
What about 2014?
What about 2015?
What about 2016?


Obama has done very little except play golf since he got into office. OH, and there's his other four hobbies: 1) blaming the republicans and fox news for everything 2) working on his NCAA pools 3) apologizing for Islam and 4) travelling the world on the taxpayer dime.
He should have been at least trying to do something about the long term debt. Trying to do something to put Social Security on better footing. At least put a proposal on the table. There's been a lot of work to do since the Messiah got into office, and quite frankly, I haven't seen a lot of work getting done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top