Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2014, 01:19 PM
 
17,586 posts, read 15,259,939 times
Reputation: 22915

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
Where was the part that said the alternative will cost more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Older cars will be grandfathered. Very few vehicles were converted from R-12. Stop whining.
When you stop production of something, the item becomes scarce. The scarcer the item, the more it costs. Why is gas $3.00 a gallon? Because there's a limited supply. That should be a pretty basic concept there.

Whether a car is grandfathered doesn't matter if you can't get the refrigerant. Sure, you can keep your car running on R-134a.. You just can't get anymore R-134a.

R-134a right now, you can get a 30lb tank for.. $150 give or take. Some cheaper, some more expensive.

1234yf is right around $120 per pound.

Now.. Figure that your car has a pound of the refrigerant.. All things told, that's not a massive add-on, because you're probably going to get hit with $500 in repairs, so the added $120 for the refrigerant isn't a HUGE cost, but.. Remembering back when you could get a pound of R-12 for 75 cents..

Price will come down, but not a whole lot. The big deal is that the equipment that shops will have to purchase will be very expensive. 1234yf is considered flammable, so any recovery equipment has to have non-incendiary parts in it (Switches, solenoids, etc) which really drives the cost up.

 
Old 09-17-2014, 05:13 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,654,438 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
like democrats give a crap about the poor either. the reality is that those in power want to hold onto that power, and those not in power want to gain that power.
Democrats support high min wage laws, healthcare for all, welfare, Sect 8 Housing, free cell phones for the poor, ex.ex. (and republicans oppose all those things.)
 
Old 09-17-2014, 05:55 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,841,834 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Democrats support high min wage laws, healthcare for all, welfare, Sect 8 Housing, free cell phones for the poor, ex.ex. (and republicans oppose all those things.)
that doesnt help the poor. all it does is keep democrats in power. as i said, politicians DONT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE POOR, OR ANYONE ELSE. they only care about their own power. how much can they grab and hold on to.
 
Old 09-17-2014, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Ohio
2,801 posts, read 2,309,800 times
Reputation: 1654
If you need to regularly recharge your cooling system either in your house or car there is something wrong with it.
 
Old 09-17-2014, 06:04 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
From the article:
For a home unit, those insignificant modifications are a new coil and compressor. Last spring I had coils replaces on two of my AC units that could use either coolant and it was $2,400. My other alternative was to live with the slow leak and charge it up every spring. In two years, the cost of the charging would be more than replacing the hardware so I went with a replacement.

Damn and I still have a huge stock pile of R-12, for my old cars.
I even have to add lead to the gas, to save the valves.
 
Old 09-17-2014, 06:08 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 28 days ago)
 
27,647 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
I fail to see how curbing greenhouse gases is bad.

Heck, if they did this 30 years earlier I probably wouldn't have asthma right now (which I pay for through inhalers).
they said inhalers were greenhouse gas too.... the new formula costs more.. Gotta wonder if its all a ploy to make more dough as micro managiing and profit are the ultimate goal of every thing these days
 
Old 09-17-2014, 06:14 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
I fail to see how curbing greenhouse gases is bad.

Heck, if they did this 30 years earlier I probably wouldn't have asthma right now (which I pay for through inhalers).
False. Completely.
 
Old 09-17-2014, 07:03 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,385,663 times
Reputation: 18436
Default Excellent post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Have you been sleeping for the last 20 plus years, the government have been trying to reduce these for many many years now. Sounds like the Post and some righties need to catch up with the rest of the population in the 21st Century. Jeeez
This is exactly what I was thinking. Excellent post and spot on.

This should be the end of this stupid thread.
 
Old 09-17-2014, 07:12 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,559 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
Where was the part that said the alternative will cost more?
gues you haven't priced a ac recharge.

the current price of the the variety of coolants is worth its weight in kugerands. To even maintain the current high cost is far too expensive.

and then there are the EPA regs for dealing with coolants in auto ac units
 
Old 09-17-2014, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,737,137 times
Reputation: 38634
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99 View Post
From the article:

Quote:
The class of chemicals to which R-134a belongs — called hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs — became popular as a replacement for Freon, the refrigerant banned since the 1990s for damaging the Earth’s ozone layer. Most HFCs are harmless to ozone, but collectively they have become a significant driver of climate change — some are up to 10,000 times as potent per ounce as carbon dioxide, climate scientists say.
So more lies. Who made a deal with what lobbyist to get this b.s. front and center?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top