Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Common knowledge. I was raised by hippies, and like most hippie children, we were not vaccinated. This is why vaccination rates are lower in nations with with higher hippie environmentalist mindsets.
I'm sorry but give me a link or something because it's not common knowledge. That may have been your childhood but not necessarily everyone else's.
Yeah right...Why don't you tell us how high sea levels were then....This is what North America looked like the last time the temperature was that high.
Wrong again, as usual. That is what North America looked like 75 to 85 million years ago. THIS is what North America looked like 3 million years ago, before the current ice-age:
No matter how often you deliberately lie to people, someone will always be there to point out your BS.
How about lowering the standard of living for hundreds of millions of people, and possible economic ruin? We have already wasted hundreds of billions of dollars accomplishing nothing in the name of AGW, except to make AGW advocates wealthier at taxpayer expense. Thus lowering our standard of living.
If Standard of Living is so important than why can't economists suggest mandatory double-entry accounting in high school? Double-entry accounting is only 700 years old, can it really be all that hard.
But the way standard of living is measured is really cash flow. Like going into debt for junk designed to become obsolete in the first place, which economists ignore the depreciation of. There were 200,000,000 cars in the US in 1995. When was the last time you heard an economist specify the depreciation lost on that junk every year?
Yeah right...Why don't you tell us how high sea levels were then....This is what North America looked like the last time the temperature was that high.
World leaders must commit themselves to holding current rises in global temperatures to 2C. That is the stark message of experts and campaigners in the runup to the United Nations climate summit that will be held in New York later this week.
They say that 2C is the maximum temperature increase that the world can tolerate without causing environmental mayhem, and they insist that politicians attending the meeting, including Barack Obama and David Cameron, must agree to that upper limit. Climate warning to world leaders: stick to 2C limit or face 'mayhem' | Environment | The Observer
Ah yes, we humans are so mighty, so powerful, that we can control nature. Tell us, Oh Wise One, how is it that the puny increases in CO2 levels that ended the Little Ice Age yielded more temperature increases than did the MASSIVE amounts of CO2 that have entered the atmosphere since the end of World War 2?
YOU are the one who stated that only 30 years of data are needed to "prove" climate change. So teach us all why the so called change has been insignificant!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
