Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We always got dessert too when we finished our dinner. And on the very, very rare occasion one of us refused to eat something, he had to sit at the dinner table until bedtime, and then whatever was left uneaten was breakfast. Food was never thrown away.
I'm so glad that my mother realized that as a child I wouldn't like everything that she liked. I was told to try everything and decide if I liked it or not. I hated lima beans, she loved them. She would cook them and didn't force me to eat them. There were other foods she liked that I didn't. I just had more of whatever else was on the table. I did the same with my daughter and she does the same with my grandson.
Did you like everything you were forced to eat? When did you get to choose what you liked and didn't like, when you moved out of the house?
Yeah, because requiring that you kids eat their veggies (which really isn't that hard to do if you start out right and are consistent) is the same as being a lunatic and beating children with wire hangers.
Yes, it's so much better to punish them by making them sit at the table until bedtime and if it's not eaten serve it up for breakfast.
Conservatives seem dead set on their kids being poorly nourished and ending up with lower IQ and generally poorer health. Fine, if you want to be behind in every way that's your choice. Enjoy your third world standard of living, your sprawling ghettos, your obesity epidemics, your masses of uninsured...
There are different forms of abuse. Punishing a child to force them to eat something they don't like is, IMO, non-violent abuse.
Are you serious? Michelle Obama is abusing kids by giving them publicly funded healthy food?
Since when are taxpayers required to pay for unhealthy food for kids? That makes no sense. It's government food, it should be healthy. If their parents want them to be fat, they're free to stuff them with cake and candy themselves.
Are you serious? Michelle Obama is abusing kids by giving them publicly funded healthy food?
Since when are taxpayers required to pay for unhealthy food for kids? That makes no sense. It's government food, it should be healthy. If their parents want them to be fat, they're free to stuff them with cake and candy themselves.
What is healthy to a 4' 9 103lb female isn't necessarily healthy for a 6' 3 210lb male.
In other threads it's noted that he can bring food from home. That is exactly what more and more seem to be doing and the lunch programs are failing.
Conservatives seem dead set on their kids being poorly nourished and ending up with lower IQ and generally poorer health. Fine, if you want to be behind in every way that's your choice. Enjoy your third world standard of living, your sprawling ghettos, your obesity epidemics, your masses of uninsured...
All because they didn't want the Fed Gov's "healthy lunch".
You forgot to add "dead bodies littering the streets" due to starvation.
Are you serious? Michelle Obama is abusing kids by giving them publicly funded healthy food?
Since when are taxpayers required to pay for unhealthy food for kids? That makes no sense. It's government food, it should be healthy. If their parents want them to be fat, they're free to stuff them with cake and candy themselves.
Are you new to public forums??
You might want to start reading the thread from the beginning or at least backtrack who I was responding to and the nature of the response before you put your foot in your mouth with a comment that is out of left field.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.