Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-24-2014, 03:14 PM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49691

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Again, I'm not discussing the merits of minimum wage law. Why is this so difficult?

I'm discussing the economic effects of rising wages. Claiming that rising wages have different economic effects based on whether they are mandated or voluntary is nonsense. ALL rising wages have THE SAME effect on an economy. Comprendes? Please stop responding with posts that are irrelevant to mine.
So, you can't tell the difference between a mandate and market forces that when faced with alternative options arrived at a wage increase.

You guys have moved the goal posts out into the parking lot and down the street at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2014, 03:21 PM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Because the government is paid to look the other way. They are lobbied to keep wages crappy. McDonalds spends quite a bit of money annually lobbying against minimum wage hikes. They could use that money to pay their workers.. but it is their way of protecting the shareholders.
So first you say we haven't opened the borders and if we did it would suppress wages and now you say the govt. is looking the other way to suppress wages?

Can you stop for a bit before you post and organize your thoughts or is this someone else that is now posting using your id?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Because the government is paid to look the other way. They are lobbied to keep wages crappy. McDonalds spends quite a bit of money annually lobbying against minimum wage hikes. They could use that money to pay their workers.. but it is their way of protecting the shareholders.
and the liberals keep cheering it on


republicans passed a bill to close the borders andput up a fence.......the liberals once they took over DEFUNDED IT and the aclu fought it


why is it the liberals CONSTANTLY push for amnesty???

liberals constantly want to give the illegals amnesty

9 amnesty bills writen by....ted kennedy....8 passed

you might want to COMPLETE that picture...there have been 9 amnesty bills, 8 PASSED, since 1965....ALL authored by Ted Kennedy



Here is Ted Kennedy commenting on the 1965 immigration bill,
Quote:
Quote
“The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission.”
End of Quote.

1986----
The 1986 Immigration Reform Act that rewarded illegal aliens with amnesty was known as the Simpson-Massoli bill of 1986. When first drafted, the bill was suppose to make it a criminal offense for aliens who were not authorized to work in the United States a federal criminal act and that it would be a federal crime for employers to hire illegal aliens.

Here's what happened, the Democrats in Congress refused to sign on this bill unless the 1.5 million illegal aliens already thought to be in the country illegally and would qualify for amnesty were rewarded amnesty. (reason being, if these illegal’s were to become U.S. citizens, guess what party they would most likely vote for ? )

So the amnesty part was added on to the bill other wise the Democrats wouldn't sign on. And to muffle the out cry, the American people were told that this amnesty was a one time thing and would never be repeated again.

Well the bill passed both democrat controlled houses of Congress and President Reagan signed the bill. In the inner circles of the administration, Ronald Reagan was to have said he may have made a mistake by signing the bill.
Guess what ?, it wasn't 1.5 million illegal aliens who would have qualified for amnesty. It turns out that over 3 million were rewarded with amnesty, mostly because of the fraud that took place during the amnesty process. Phony rent receipts, phony pay check stubs, liberal judges expunging criminal records of illegal aliens!!!

And after the bill became law, you had Teddy Kennedy watering down the enforcement part of the bill that had to do with enforcing and prosecuting employers who hired illegal aliens.


In 1986 Senator Kennedy said,
Quote:
‘This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.’
like all liberals...he lied


In 1994, Ted Kennedy’s Section 245(i) Amnesty gave legal residence and jobs to 578,000 illegal aliens. It was a temporary rolling amnesty primarily for extended family members of immigrants who instead of waiting in line, come on to the country illegally.

In 1997, Ted Kennedy’s extension of the Section 245(i) rolling amnesty was followed by an increasing flow of illegal immigration.

In 1997, Ted Kennedy also won an amnesty for close to one million illegal aliens from Central America. Illegal immigration sped up some more.

In 1998, Ted Kennedy won an amnesty for 125,000 illegal aliens from Haiti.

In 2000, Ted Kennedy got the so-called Late Amnesty, legalizing another 400,000 illegal aliens who claimed that they missed out on Kennedy’s 1986 amnesty.

In 2000, Ted Kennedy also won the LIFE Act Amnesty for an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens. It was another reinstatement of the rolling Section 245(i) amnesty...an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens. Illegal immigration accelerated.




yep the amnesty freak liberals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top