Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Models make predictions and NONE of them predicted the slowdown we are seeing.
Despite the fact that "the science is settled" and we have this 97% consensus, none of them can EXPLAIN the slowdown we are seeing.
Stay on-topic. It is your thread after all.
Your article speaks specifically to deep water temperatures. This is recent data. I am not aware of any deep sea temperature models.
I never mention settled science or consensus.
Before Argo floats were deployed, temperature measurements in the Southern Ocean were spotty, at best. Using satellite measurements and climate simulations of sea level changes around the world, the new study found the global ocean absorbed far more heat in those 35 years than previously thought -- a whopping 24 to 58 percent more than early estimates.
Does it really matter whether the heat is stored deep or shallow?
Stay on-topic. It is your thread after all.
Your article speaks specifically to deep water temperatures. This is recent data. I am not aware of any deep sea temperature models.
I never mention settled science or consensus.
it is on topic because the computer models and the consensus missed this development and they STILL can't explain it.
Before Argo floats were deployed, temperature measurements in the Southern Ocean were spotty, at best. Using satellite measurements and climate simulations of sea level changes around the world, the new study found the global ocean absorbed far more heat in those 35 years than previously thought -- a whopping 24 to 58 percent more than early estimates.
Does it really matter whether the heat is stored deep or shallow?
it also says the heat doesnt account for the recent pause
Models make predictions and NONE of them predicted the slowdown we are seeing.
Despite the fact that "the science is settled" and we have this 97% consensus, none of them can EXPLAIN the slowdown we are seeing.
The 97% consensus is made up too, by the way. There is no more evidence to support that than there is for the claim that the missing heat is hiding at the bottom of the deep part of the oceans.
Before Argo floats were deployed, temperature measurements in the Southern Ocean were spotty, at best. Using satellite measurements and climate simulations of sea level changes around the world, the new study found the global ocean absorbed far more heat in those 35 years than previously thought -- a whopping 24 to 58 percent more than early estimates.
Does it really matter whether the heat is stored deep or shallow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713
The 97% consensus is made up too, by the way. There is no more evidence to support that than there is for the claim that the missing heat is hiding at the bottom of the deep part of the oceans.
Before Argo floats were deployed, temperature measurements in the Southern Ocean were spotty, at best. Using satellite measurements and climate simulations of sea level changes around the world, the new study found the global ocean absorbed far more heat in those 35 years than previously thought -- a whopping 24 to 58 percent more than early estimates.
Does it really matter whether the heat is stored deep or shallow?
it also says the heat doesn't account for the recent pause
That's why they want to find out what's going on.
That's what science IS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.