Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:13 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Hey, it fits right in with the conservative myth that Reagan could do no wrong.
Reagan did plenty of wrong things, you could even argue the response to AIDS was flawed however comparing that to what is going on now is ridiculous.

To the OP, if you had a choice of spending 24 hours in a packed arena full of AIDS victims or a closet with one Ebola victim your choice would be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:16 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Hooray for idiotic threads!
That's because the Leftists are grasping at straws to support this FAILURE OF A PRESIDENT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:20 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,295,184 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Hey, it fits right in with the conservative myth that Reagan could do no wrong.
I don't think anyone believes that Reagan "could do no wrong." But he sure as hell was a damn sight better than this failure, who is worse by far than even jimmy Carter, and will probably go down in history as the worst president in the history of our country, if we survive.

He is trying to destroy America, and he is succeeding. That was his purpose all along, and the Leftists are helping him. If we survive the next few years, it's going to take forty or fifty years to rebuild America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,626 posts, read 10,380,316 times
Reputation: 19509
Reagan ignored AIDS and look what happened. Last stats I read, there are over a million people in the US infected with HIV today. HIV was badly handled by Reagan. There is no doubt about it.

Does acknowledgement of Reagan's failures to recognize the impact of AIDS on Americans mitigate Obama's failures to do the same, including appointing a LAWYER as Ebola Czar, make you feel better, safer, happy? Good grief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,707,495 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Last I heard you couldn't get AIDS from someone sneezing.

Your comparison is no where near analogous.
That's easy to say with the benefit of 30+ years of science under the belt.

There was indeed Aids Hysteria in the early 80's that persisted into the 90's. Heck fear and ignorance persists, today.

Back in the 80's not enough was known. Some scientists warned it was either airborne or mutation was just around the corner and that bodily fluids on surfaces could spread the virus.

Here and there, across the US, school districts sent letters home to inform parents that a child was enrolled in the district who was living with someone with Aids in their household. Then came initiatives to ban gay teachers in classrooms because they would infect the children.

There was an abundance of moral panic within churches.

Employers faced serious, serious challenges when they became aware one of their employees had Aids.
Landlords and communities faces challenges upon learning someone with Aids was in their community.

The biggest differences between then and now was the absence of 24/7 fear mongering on political cable TV/radio, the internet and social media.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:46 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,746,641 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Why didn't conservatives hold President Reagan accountable for AIDS?


Because he wasn't called the 'Teflon President' without reason.
that's obama's nickname I thought. I have been calling him that since 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:55 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,397,040 times
Reputation: 9438
Actually, there was a lot of criticism of Pres. Reagan over his handling of the AIDS epidemic. I am actually surprised that some of the posters here would not remember that. When the AIDS epidemic hit there were the same concerns now with Ebola. Would it mutant? How did it spread so rapidly? How do you contain it? Why aren't we spending more to find a cure?

There are no easy ways to contain an emerging epidemic in this day and age. If posters are intellectually honest they would all agree. That there are only two confirmed cases since Duncan shows that the government is doing some things right. Undoubtedly more to do and we are in the early stages of the spread of the disease so we can contain it, but I hardly doubt that anyone else would have done things much differently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:56 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,539,703 times
Reputation: 6392
Many people tried to shut down the gay brothels where the patrons were spreading AIDs, but they resisted until they were too sick to attend anymore.

Read, 'And the Band Played On'.

Patient Zero spread the virus to thousands. And that's just one guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 08:57 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,746,641 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlevinKelevra View Post
funny, since he wasn't president in 2008.
the election was november 2008. all throughout the election process nothing he did would stick to him. don't get mad because democrats are going to get mutilated in november. senate buh bye.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 09:03 AM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
2,440 posts, read 3,429,912 times
Reputation: 2629
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
A lot of conservatives and Republicans have been criticizing President Obama for mishandling the current Ebola situation. Why didn't these same people criticize President Reagan when thousands of Americans were contracting HIV/AIDS?
Personal bias, void of logic, based on party preference, prejudice and apathy. Welcome to politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top