Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
anyways the grammer is irrelevant to the topic. Who remembers the roaring 50's, and 60's? a time of massive expansion, and while I might buy the claim that the 50's was the result of everyone being bombed during the WW2, it doesn't explain the 60's or even the 70's.
You know, when tax rates for the rich were double of todays rates....
No offense but I am pretty sure you are not part of the wealthy I am referring to.
You have no idea who you are referring to. You never will as they are ambiguous; they are as silent partners.
As far as redisributing all of the wealth of this nation....after you take it away and hand it all out, who pays taxes to the federal government? You already raided the vaults of those who pay taxes, what now?
Tax the wealthy?
You have no idea who you are referring to. You never will as they are ambiguous; they are as silent partners.
As far as redisributing all of the wealth of this nation....after you take it away and hand it all out, who pays taxes to the federal government? You already raided the vaults of those who pay taxes, what now?
Tax the wealthy?
You people are idiots.
How can we argue with intellect so grand as to resort to insults?
If taxes on the wealthy are increased, there is more government revenue. I didn't think that concept was so difficult to grasp.
You have no idea who you are referring to. You never will as they are ambiguous; they are as silent partners.
As far as redisributing all of the wealth of this nation....after you take it away and hand it all out, who pays taxes to the federal government? You already raided the vaults of those who pay taxes, what now?
Tax the wealthy?
You people are idiots.
you do know, we dont tax wealth federally for that vast majority of cases right? That we tax income....so if all the wealth was redistributed as income....the taxes for that year would be mind boggling.
But really thats just a thought experiment as theres not enough cash to pay for all the wealth. LOL. and at 712K income per person they'de be in the top bracket I think.
Anyways redistributing all the wealth is a insane idea. theres a healthy level of inequality that makes our economic system work extremely well, unfortunately we are way beyond healthy levels of inequality.
Money is made up. It only has intrinsic value by law. There are more things to life than money. Heck, greed and gluttony are sins, yet the holier than thou Republicans endorse greed to the fullest. Hypocrisy.
Actually it is Democrats cRying about the wealth disparity
You have no idea who you are referring to. You never will as they are ambiguous; they are as silent partners.
As far as redisributing all of the wealth of this nation....after you take it away and hand it all out, who pays taxes to the federal government? You already raided the vaults of those who pay taxes, what now?
Tax the wealthy?
You people are idiots.
Isn't that where they just print more money ? The government never runs out of money. If they did there would be no deficit. They spend money they don't have. Money is made out of nothing. When Joe Blow gets his check and spends it all he knows he's broke. He can't make it out of nothing. His investment in magic class was a waste.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
