Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:22 PM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,418,625 times
Reputation: 6388

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You don't understand the process of wealth redistribution. Actually, there is no such thing as trickle down, only trickle up.
Winston Churchill had it right: "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."

Economic stagnation is the only thing that trickles up, or haven't you been paying attention?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,237,405 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The wealthy have sucked up American resources like no other time in history. Why does the right-wing want more tax cuts for the wealthy at the expense of others and well being of our country?

How the Ultra-Rich .01% Have Sucked Up Even More of America's Wealth Than You Think

It's never enough with you people. You just don't get it. Sooner or later, you will run out of other people's money. When will your side get up and fight the good fight. Cut the EBT down, reduce unemployment benefits, whack as many social programs as possible and cut the government payroll by 30 percent.

Eliminate waste and then there will be PLENTY of money to lend, plenty to invest in infrastructure.....you answer to YOUR problems is tax someone else. It's a failure from the start.

I'm not rich. Not even close and this year the AMT might kick in. Capiche? Regardless, the LAST thing I want to do is to tax ANYONE to help me out. I'll do fine. I keep clawing away at other opportunities and one will hit. If, for whatever reason, they do not, it's no one's fault but my own.

When will your people realize YOU are responsible for your well being, not some ******* down the road. Make your own day "go bedduh" and quit looking to steal other people's cash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,200,586 times
Reputation: 21745
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The wealthy have sucked up American resources like no other time in history. Why does the right-wing want more tax cuts for the wealthy at the expense of others and well being of our country?

How the Ultra-Rich .01% Have Sucked Up Even More of America's Wealth Than You Think
Lying
A fallacy of reasoning that depends on intentionally saying something that is known to be false.

Suppressed Evidence
Intentionally failing to use information suspected of being relevant and significant is committing the fallacy of suppressed evidence. This fallacy usually occurs when the information counts against one’s own conclusion.

Denying the Antecedent
You are using this fallacy if you deny the antecedent of a conditional and then suppose that doing so is a sufficient reason for denying the consequent

Quote:
According to the most recent Federal Reserve Flow of Funds report, US households currently have an all-time high $82 trillion in overall wealth. If that wealth were spread out evenly, every US household would now have $712k.
The evidence you suppressed is right there.

Why don't you explain it to everyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You don't understand the process of wealth redistribution.
And that is something else you will adamantly refuse to define objectively in no uncertain terms, just like "Living Wage" (snicker).


Challenging...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:50 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,952,864 times
Reputation: 18305
They have always done that and more than paid their share. The real issues is should it be redistributed by government to other individuals rather than government services to all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:58 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,409,333 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
The evidence you suppressed is right there.

Why don't you explain it to everyone?
Why dont you? I mean your whole post is one giant personal attack, calling him a liar, etc. I think if you want to support that statement you should dive in, present some facts-you know, have an honest debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,236,806 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You don't understand the process of wealth redistribution. Actually, there is no such thing as trickle down, only trickle up.
I understand the rich have got richer and the poor poorer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 06:01 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,384,529 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
I understand the rich have got richer and the poor poorer
I could have been poor.....but, I did not want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,859,299 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
"Why the wealthy does not need tax cuts."

They're better at grammar than the non-wealthy and deserve a break.
So what is wrong with that grammar? Would you say, "the crowd do not need water?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 06:20 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,286 posts, read 87,510,121 times
Reputation: 55564
An old argument the wealthy or aka others don't need money I do give me yours
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2014, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,859,299 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
Winston Churchill had it right: "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."

Economic stagnation is the only thing that trickles up
, or haven't you been paying attention?
Not true for the wealthy! They literally got rich off the labor of the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top