Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you vote for this proposal?
Yes 7 11.11%
No 56 88.89%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:21 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,401,413 times
Reputation: 4025

Advertisements

This is more of a conceptual question than you think. Answer with a simple yes or no.

Proposal:

-Capital Gains Taxes taxed the same as regular income taxes.
-Eliminate Corporate Taxes
-Income tax marginal rates adjusted for inflation going forward

New marginal rates (double for married filers):

$0-$500,000: 0%

$500,000 - $1 million: 50%

$1 million+: 90%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,733,041 times
Reputation: 15482
I voted no.

I think I see where you are going with this, and I don't think it is, in principle, a terrible idea, but exempting single taxpayers up to $500k? And then taking 90% of everything over $1 million? You'd have to do some serious convincing to get me on board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:36 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,810,437 times
Reputation: 18304
No; that is the problem now too many with no skin in the game wanting government free stuff. Its really silly because you eliminate the providers by over taxing them to disincentive work at that level. To put it in plain language ;now can you support so many freeloaders without them; you can't. What you going to do when they all move their money making and jobs it creates to other countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,413,374 times
Reputation: 4190
"Double for married filers"

So a couple of doctors earning $500,000+ would pay 100%. Nice plan. And double 90% - your math is bad. You would make a fine dictator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,073,895 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
"Double for married filers"

So a couple of doctors earning $500,000+ would pay 100%. Nice plan. And double 90% - your math is bad. You would make a fine dictator.
Or Mayor of Wasilla...or maybe the Gov of Alaska?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:17 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,401,413 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
I voted no.

I think I see where you are going with this, and I don't think it is, in principle, a terrible idea, but exempting single taxpayers up to $500k? And then taking 90% of everything over $1 million? You'd have to do some serious convincing to get me on board.
So yes, the proposal is to exempt just over 99% of Americans from paying income taxes. It is that simple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
No; that is the problem now too many with no skin in the game wanting government free stuff. Its really silly because you eliminate the providers by over taxing them to disincentive work at that level. To put it in plain language ;now can you support so many freeloaders without them; you can't. What you going to do when they all move their money making and jobs it creates to other countries.
So let me get this straight... you're willing to pay income taxes instead of not paying income taxes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
"Double for married filers"

So a couple of doctors earning $500,000+ would pay 100%. Nice plan. And double 90% - your math is bad. You would make a fine dictator.
No, it is just sad that you don't understand what a marginal tax rate is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,413,374 times
Reputation: 4190
I understand fully what a marginal rate is. Explain double for married filers? Do you mean double the income or double the rate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:23 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,401,413 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
I understand fully what a marginal rate is. Explain double for married filers? Do you mean double the income or double the rate?
Double the income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:24 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,401,413 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
I voted no.

I think I see where you are going with this, and I don't think it is, in principle, a terrible idea, but exempting single taxpayers up to $500k? And then taking 90% of everything over $1 million? You'd have to do some serious convincing to get me on board.
What convincing is there?

Do you make over $500,000 / year?

The proposal is that you would pay no federal income tax on your first $500,000 annually. I don't know how that takes any convincing.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:30 PM
 
2,727 posts, read 2,832,211 times
Reputation: 4113
Why would people who make below $500k be exempt from paying any income tax? Do we not use federal gov't services? Should we not contribute?
I don't think people who are financially successful should basically be subsidizing me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top