Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2014, 04:56 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
Bills which reek of the stench of rich-only supporting Republican goals are NOT what's good for this country. This is why these smelly bills weren't addressed in the Senate. The trickle-down stench of those bills shouldn't see the light of day. Now that Republicans control the Senate, this country will be subjected to the stench of these bills, before they are VETOED. It will be two years of Republicans in Congress wasting the taxpayers time and money, without getting a damn thing done for the benefit of all, not just the rich.

The GOP has been nothing but an obstructionist party. Dems must emphasize this going forward.
The non stop ignorance of many on the left is astounding..

The Senates job is to reconcile those bills and send them back to the House..

Please return to 4th grade..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2014, 04:58 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,920,032 times
Reputation: 1305
Well, 50 of them were bills to repeal some or all of Obamacare. If the others were along the same vein I would imagine the senate would let them rot. A relevant, well crafted piece of legislation with at least SOME bi-partisan support probably got action in the senate. Most of the stuff the house threw out there was just chest thumping meat for the wing nuts with no chance of going anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,419,987 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Thank you for continuing to post on this forum. I, for one, enjoy laughing at you.

He is always good for a laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Harry Reid and harry reid alone is fully responsible for not bringing bills to the floor.
Well then I am sure we will see a flood of right wing bills flying off McConnell's desk and onto the Senate floor to be voted on without any concern for filibusters now. And I am sure you will be blaming McConnell when that doesn't happen.

This is gonna be a funny year on city data watching right wingers figure out who to blame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:03 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,920,032 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The non stop ignorance of many on the left is astounding..

The Senates job is to reconcile those bills and send them back to the House..

Please return to 4th grade..

Fail.... Even though reconciliation did not exist when I was in the 4th grade, its a process for budget bills. Not for most of the legislation thrown up against the wall recently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:13 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrow1 View Post
Fail.... Even though reconciliation did not exist when I was in the 4th grade, its a process for budget bills. Not for most of the legislation thrown up against the wall recently.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33321032/S...-Bill-Into-Law

If Other House INTRODUCES AMENDMENTS, and disagreementarises, differences will be settled bythe Conference Committee of bothhouses

Why didnt Reid send them to conference to amend?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:14 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Thank you for continuing to post on this forum. I, for one, enjoy laughing at you.
shrug, go read the bills. You don't even know what they are and you're whining and insulting people.

Imagine that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:19 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,920,032 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
[scribd]33321032[/scribd]

If Other House INTRODUCES AMENDMENTS, and disagreementarises, differences will be settled bythe Conference Committee of bothhouses

Why didnt Reid send them to conference to amend?
That's not reconciliation. Why would senate trigger conference committee by amending a bill to overturn ACA? Would be stupid and a waste of time, better to just let it die. The only reason it was even sent in the first place was so the the other side pound their chest and say "we are trying to overturn Obamacare".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:23 PM
 
59,089 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
Bills which reek of the stench of rich-only supporting Republican goals are NOT what's good for this country. This is why these smelly bills weren't addressed in the Senate. The trickle-down stench of those bills shouldn't see the light of day. Now that Republicans control the Senate, this country will be subjected to the stench of these bills, before they are VETOED. It will be two years of Republicans in Congress wasting the taxpayers time and money, without getting a damn thing done for the benefit of all, not just the rich.

The GOP has been nothing but an obstructionist party. Dems must emphasize this going forward.
If they are as bad as you claim, with not one scintilla of data to back it up, why would ole harry NOT give them to the respective committees to kill them since the dems CONTROL every committee?

All they have to do is ask for vote from the committee. being they hold the majority of votes they would have no problem voting them down.

Why is harry so afraid to do this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:28 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,920,032 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
If they are as bad as you claim, with not one scintilla of data to back it up, why would ole harry NOT give them to the respective committees to kill them since the dems CONTROL every committee?

All they have to do is ask for vote from the committee. being they hold the majority of votes they would have no problem voting them down.

Why is harry so afraid to do this?

Maybe its to say "If you want expend the time and resources of the senate on your bill, then send us something that at least has a chance in hell of ever passing". 50 times is a bit tiring wouldn't you say?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top