Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, it's not. States that don't have their own minimum wage laws are consistently the poorest states in the nation (not because of MW itself, but because they are regressive and anti-labor as a whole). The government doles out the most welfare for these states. We shouldn't be subsidizing them.
Why don't you want those low skills to find employment?
You must really hate the poor
What difference does it make? $3 / hour won't improve their situation so what's the point? Whether they earn $0 / hour or $3 / hour, they will need welfare either way. The only difference is $3 / hour is a salary, which means their employer is getting subsidized by me the taxpayer. I'll pass on the corporate welfare.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
