Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's not "the same comments over and over". There are 6 separate videos and each is very damning. I realize you've been brainwashed to down play his comments as just noise. That's how the left rolls.
"Look at the whole picture and you will find you are being played.". What's funny is, now America is FINALLY seeing the whole picture and seeing how they were being played. Yes, by the Obama administration, but more so by a complicit media that wouldn't do their job.
There were questions at every turn about how they were coming up with their bogus numbers and the media wouldn't ask questions. Obama/Pelosi etc would down play it as politics and the media would bury it for them.
Those of us paying attention knew exactly what was going on and how much of a disaster Obamacare would be. Anyone paying attention could see that it wouldn't work the way they were telling us.
Shame on the media for covering it all up. Shame on Americans for allowing it to happen
It's not "the same comments over and over". There are 6 separate videos and each is very damning. I realize you've been brainwashed to down play his comments as just noise. That's how the left rolls.
"Look at the whole picture and you will find you are being played.". What's funny is, now America is FINALLY seeing the whole picture and seeing how they were being played. Yes, by the Obama administration, but more so by a complicit media that wouldn't do their job.
There were questions at every turn about how they were coming up with their bogus numbers and the media wouldn't ask questions. Obama/Pelosi etc would down play it as politics and the media would bury it for them.
Those of us paying attention knew exactly what was going on and how much of a disaster Obamacare would be. Anyone paying attention could see that it wouldn't work the way they were telling us.
Shame on the media for covering it all up. Shame on Americans for allowing it to happen
Exactly - and though people may say he didn't mean to call voters stupid, the fundamental deception he exposed still exists. It's the same deception that allowed Mr. Obama to lie when he said "if you like you plan, you can keep it." Anyone that repeated this argument can consider themselves duped. It never made any sense that you could leave so many people untouched, add 30 million new people all while lowering costs. On it's face, it isn't believable, but many believed it and some still do.
Shame on the media for covering it all up. Shame on Americans for allowing it to happen
Its not like we didn't try. Republicans, right-wing media and Conservatives online all tried to warn everyone about the reality of the ACA while it was still being debated. Predictably, any opposition to it was dismissed as hatred of a Black President or hatred of the poor who can't afford health insurance. Democrats proved Gruber's points by blindly supporting the ACA at face value without thinking about the effects and consequences of this massive legislation.
Eventually, most of what we predicted about the ACA has happened pretty much like we said. The Left-wing response is "Republicans didn't offer any alternatives", which is a lie. They had lots of alternative ideas, only the Democrat Congress left GOP healthcare bills to wither and die on the vine.
Insurance premiums are usually appropriately risk-adjusted. Obamacare doesn't allow that. The healthy are being overcharged for their insurance to pay for the sick. Even Gruber admits it. Those who are responsible, physically fit, live a healthy lifestyle, etc., are being overcharged to pay for the negative health consequences of the irresponsible obese, smokers, drug/alcohol abusers, etc.
Appropriate is a charged, subjective and vague word that is absolutely not applicable, under any interpretation of the word, to risk adjustment practices in health insurance when it came to individuals with pre-existing conditions in the micro-group and individual markets - which is where this issue would come into play.
A person with a genetic eye disease that was of-counsel to my firm could not get insurance for his family for less than $3,000/mo in the individual market. We decided to bring him into our firm, and permit him to continue his consulting practice, and enroll in our small group plan for his family at $1,200/mo with no effective impact to our premiums.
The ACA risk pooling mechanisms established for the individual market are a wholly positive change for the consumer, and health insurance as a product and mitigates actuarial restrictions on premium adjustments for the high-risk individual.
Oh, man. So, only the right was complaining? From the investors.com article you linked.
Quote:
In fact, the existence of Gruber's fat $400,000 contract didn't emerge until after the Senate passed ObamaCare — when a blogger for the left-wing website Daily Kos posted a link in early January 2010 complaining about Gruber's "sole source" contract for "technical assistance in evaluating options for national healthcare reform." The contract claimed that Gruber was the "only one responsible source" available for such help.
Who are the sheep following? The RW media overplaying the same comments over and over. The speaker (Gruber) who said he was wrong for making the comments last week.
Who followed the discussion, those who have gotten the Ins, and find it works just fine and has lower costs. Or the people who listen to the RW media and fall for every website claiming that Obamacare is bad.
Look at the whole picture and you will find you are being played.
So he said he's wrong and that makes it ok in your book?
He goes into great detail on how they manipulated the public on this bill. And yes, they being himself, Obama and his administration.
It's amazing how this stuff just is ok by many Obama lovers on CD. I'm just floored everyday how much you guys will accept and just roll over and take it ... nothing bothers you about Obama.
Appropriate is a charged, subjective and vague word that is absolutely not applicable, under any interpretation of the word, to risk adjustment practices in health insurance when it came to individuals with pre-existing conditions in the micro-group and individual markets - which is where this issue would come into play.
Indeed, it is. That's why states had high risk insurance pools even before the ACA.
The ACA risk pooling mechanisms established for the individual market are a wholly positive change for the consumer
No, they're not.Way too many people have seen their premiums, co-pays, and deductibles skyrocket.
Quote:
"Americans who say they’ve been hurt by Obamacare outnumber those who say they’ve benefited from it by more than 2 to 1, according to recent polls by both Rasmussen and Gallup."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.