Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,024 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
The truth is we don't know Wilson that well. Neither one of us knew either personally.

Wilson doesn't have a squeaky clean past. All I'm concerned about are the facts of the case.

Brown was unarmed and killed 135 ft away from the cruiser. And possibly shot while fleeing. And then possibly executed while surrendering.

None of us were there. And so far, nobody has been able to completely prove Darren Wilson's story adds up.
Again, it matters not if Brown was armed or not. He was a predator, a suspect in a robbery, who just assaulted an officer, and was a fugitive from justice (evading arrest).
Those are the facts of the case no one disputes.

Calling the shooting an "execution" is a lame attempt to cast doubt.

However, a felon takes upon himself all consequences of his unlawful behavior. For without his initial criminal act, nothing else would have happened.

 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:15 PM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,126,416 times
Reputation: 4228
Quote:
Originally Posted by eqttrdr View Post
for you "Gentle Giant" lovers....

time to END this thread right now.. I'm tired of this nonsense..


for your viewing pleasure


</thread>
If only that was Michael Brown.



And that still doesn't make him all of a sudden armed when he was shot.




What other LIES about the case have been debunked? Orbital eye bone fracture. 35 ft from the car. He grabbed the gun (no fingerprints).
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:16 PM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,126,416 times
Reputation: 4228
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Again, it matters not if Brown was armed or not. He was a predator, a suspect in a robbery, who just assaulted an officer, and was a fugitive from justice (evading arrest).
Those are the facts of the case no one disputes.

Wilson didn't know about the robbery. And we don't know who started the altercation.

Calling the shooting an "execution" is a lame attempt to cast doubt.

However, a felon takes upon himself all consequences of his unlawful behavior. For without his initial act, nothing else would have followed.

So if he didn't start the physical altercation, and was surrendering when he turned around, he deserved to be shot in cold blood?


 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,024 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
Wilson didn't know about the robbery. And we don't know who started the altercation.

So if he didn't start the physical altercation, and was surrendering when he turned around, he deserved to be shot in cold blood?
A. Mr Brown did start the altercation - at the store, when he robbed it and assaulted the clerk. . . FELONY #1.
And when he reached into the vehicle and assaulted the officer. FELONY #2.
B. He was not surrendering when he turned around and rushed the officer. A surrender would be dropping to the ground, hands behind his back. FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE.
C. In cold blood means without emotional tumult. Being hit in the head by a massive thug is not conducive to "cold blood."
D. Officer Wilson stated that he backed up to confront Brown after reviewing the description of the suspect in the robbery, so he DID know of the prior act.
E. Justification and deserve are not synonymous. Brown's actions justified the officer's actions.

In retrospect, I wonder if all of Mr Brown's other victims would be so charitable about what he deserves.
You don't really believe that just that day, Mr Brown decided to become a thief and a brute, did you?

Last edited by jetgraphics; 11-27-2014 at 02:31 PM..
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:23 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,506,034 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post


All I'm concerned about are the facts of the case.

Good one
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Here
11,578 posts, read 13,947,225 times
Reputation: 7009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
Let's all remember here Michael Brown was unarmed. And not killed in the cruiser or by it.
Let's also remember that cops have been killed by unarmed people. All it takes is coming out on the wrong end of a struggle for a gun and you're dead.
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Let's also remember that cops have been killed by unarmed people. All it takes is coming out on the wrong end of a struggle for a gun and you're dead.

Anyone defending this kid is blind. A thug is a thug. He pushes a store owner and then fights with a cop to the point a gun is discharged. That cop could have been killed just as easily as Brown or the store owner.
 
Old 11-27-2014, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
So if he didn't start the physical altercation, and was surrendering when he turned around, he deserved to be shot in cold blood?




He wasn't shot in cold blood.
 
Old 11-27-2014, 03:10 PM
 
3,216 posts, read 2,084,767 times
Reputation: 1863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
The truth is we don't know Wilson that well. Neither one of us knew either personally.



Wilson doesn't have a squeaky clean past. All I'm concerned about are the facts of the case.




Brown was unarmed and killed 135 ft away from the cruiser. And possibly shot while fleeing. And then possibly executed while surrendering.







None of us were there. And so far, nobody has been able to completely prove Darren Wilson's story adds up.
The way I read it, there are no witnesses who's statements match the physical evidence see it like you do.
 
Old 11-27-2014, 03:35 PM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,126,416 times
Reputation: 4228
I guess you know more than the multiple forensics experts who worked on the case.


One who had to come out publicly afterwards and state that the media was twisting her analysis.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top