Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The methods of impeachment must be changed in the US. This is because although it takes
2/3 of the Senate to impeach a sitting President, Senators are no longer selected by states,
but elected by the general public.
Until the laws are changed, it is going to be impossible to impeach a sitting President as long
as one party can maintain 1/3 +1 in Senate.
I agree, the states should have the final say over impeachment of a potus, not the senate.
The methods of impeachment must be changed in the US. This is because although it takes
2/3 of the Senate to impeach a sitting President, Senators are no longer selected by states,
but elected by the general public.
Until the laws are changed, it is going to be impossible to impeach a sitting President as long
as one party can maintain 1/3 +1 in Senate.
The House starts the process then votes on articles of impeachment THEN it goes to the Senate for "trial"..
Please , PLEASE read up a little BEFORE making claims
"Should any one of the Articles of Impeachment be approved by a simple majority vote, the President will be "impeached." However, being impeached is sort of like being indicted of a crime. There still has to be a trial, which is where the US Senate comes in.
The House starts the process then votes on articles of impeachment THEN it goes to the Senate for "trial"..
Please , PLEASE read up a little BEFORE making claims
"Should any one of the Articles of Impeachment be approved by a simple majority vote, the President will be "impeached." However, being impeached is sort of like being indicted of a crime. There still has to be a trial, which is where the US Senate comes in.
I'm very well read on this issue. The House impeaches, and the Senate tries. Snowball7 said the Senate impeaches - I was simply correcting that misinformation. My "claims" were 100% accurate.
How does me recognizing that wrench409 and BentBow are talking about the proper "remedy" for our Obama problem being rebellion/assassination (a "2nd Amendment Solution") let you see how I think?
Boy, you read a lot into other peoples statements. Makes one wonder what YOUR motives truly are.
What is so great about the USA... One man(or woman) can stop oppression and loss of liberties from another man(or woman), in an instant. Knowing full, well they could be making the ultimate sacrifice to ensure freedom for others, to last another day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Votre_Chef
Let me tell you what's actually going to happen.
In 2016 the Republicans are going to get pasted.
You are going to keep going on the internet talking about 2nd Amendment solutions and the loss of your rights (same exact nonsense you're spouting right now) . But that's all you're going to do--keep making empty threats.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
The truth of the right to bear arms v. some fantasy about an up coming election cycle and accusations of empty threats, when no threat was made. The threat is always there, from the beginning of the nation.
The days when political opponents had duels at 10 paces.
The truth of the right to bear arms v. some fantasy about an election cycle and accusations of empty threats, when no threat was made. The threat is always there, from the beginning of the nation.
The days when political opponents had duels at 10 paces.
Yes, we all full understand why you constantly laugh at the constitution of the United States of America.
No, just at you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.