Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hartmann would have trouble beating fence post in a debate.
Ahhh people like him make a living doing this. I'd suggest that debating someone who is making a living doing it means you are most likely going to lose.
I wouldn't want to take on Rush Limbaugh in a debate either, hes going to know the talking points, and how to manipulate the conversation FAR better then I will. Same for Hartmann.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar
Ahhh people like him make a living doing this. I'd suggest that debating someone who is making a living doing it means you are most likely going to lose.
I wouldn't want to take on Rush Limbaugh in a debate either, hes going to know the talking points, and how to manipulate the conversation FAR better then I will. Same for Hartmann.
Exactly...there are some on here who "think" they are in that league when it comes to blowing smoke,but that's all in their own minds..as much as I despise Limpbaugh,I wouldn't want to debate him..to many twists and turns and he knows them all...now a boxing match with just welding gloves on? Different story
Ahhh people like him make a living doing this. I'd suggest that debating someone who is making a living doing it means you are most likely going to lose.
There is only ONE relevant issue. What's true. I don't give a rat's behind about popularity polls. I see you admit that he's manipulative, but don't argue he's right.
There is only ONE relevant issue. What's true. I don't give a rat's behind about popularity polls. I see you admit that he's manipulative, but don't argue he's right.
Score one loss for you and one for Hartmann.
Uhmmm sure. Go ahead and believe that. Everything I said was 100% true. Apparently you do not in fact care whats true.
Exactly...there are some on here who "think" they are in that league when it comes to blowing smoke,but that's all in their own minds..as much as I despise Limpbaugh,I wouldn't want to debate him..to many twists and turns and he knows them all...now a boxing match with just welding gloves on? Different story
Limbaugh doesn't debate.
That clip of Hartman wasn't much of a debate, but that was because the other party was a bumbling fool. Hartman didn't constantly talk over, he let the guy speak. Limbaugh would more likely be like the bumbling fool, with even more of a bumbling fool on the other end.
There's debating, then there's just one moron talking louder than the other moron.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk
There is only ONE relevant issue. What's true. I don't give a rat's behind about popularity polls. I see you admit that he's manipulative, but don't argue he's right.
Score one loss for you and one for Hartmann.
Usually someone needs to know HOW to play the game before they try to score the game..you are getting way ahead of yourself there little buckaroo.
Usually someone needs to know HOW to play the game before they try to score the game..you are getting way ahead of yourself there little buckaroo.
I don't play games.
I am only interested in objective truth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
