Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So local weather IS indicative of climate change now? Hmmm...that goes against all the hysterical bleeting from the progressives everytime some flat earther complains about weather in his location.
Just to clarify. We can now use local weather to ascertain whether or not climate change is real?
We just went through the hottest October on record. And winter hasn't even begun yet. Sounds like climate change to me.
The word "proof" is important. It is not found by anecdote, it is not found by quoting people who advance theories.
PROOF is required. If you have no proof, your statement is a LIE, because you know it isn't fact.
If the word proof is important then why is that word not used anywhere in the definition you posted?
scientific method
The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.
Proofs exist only in mathematics and logic, not in science. Mathematics and logic are both closed, self-contained systems of propositions, whereas science is empirical and deals with nature as it exists.
Hmmmm. Were the record low temperatures in July also climate change?
What record low temperatures? July was the hottest month in the contiguous U.S. since records began in 1895, according to new data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. July Marked Hottest Month on U.S. Record - WSJ
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,730,207 times
Reputation: 20050
so now the hot plates want to blame a little snow storm that only covers a few square miles on climate change?? since when did a few square miles become the whole world..
I'm researching winter weather in the Niagara region during the mid-1800s. The newspapers don't provide many measurements and often the description of the weather events are brief and general, but over all it seems that every example of man-made climate change that the proponents have put forth occurred back then.
I'm researching winter weather in the Niagara region during the mid-1800s. The newspapers don't provide many measurements and often the description of the weather events are brief and general, but over all it seems that every example of man-made climate change that the proponents have put forth occurred back then.
According to geological data there was two hurricanes that hit parts of New England in the 1600's that were approximately the same as Sandy... two years apart. Imagine the media circus if that happened now.
There is also geological data that indicates parts of California get massive flooding approximately every 500 years going back 10's of thousands of years. They are due and when it occurs it will be the worse natural disaster in US history assuming Yellowstone doesn't blow it's top or something similar..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
