Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:09 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,558,442 times
Reputation: 16468

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
What are you even trying to prove? You are the one who said he was fighting police. We all told you to watch the video, which you obviously had not done, because he clearly was not fighting the police. Someone else mentioned resisting arrest which no one argued against. Then you tried to say that resisting arrest was fighting against the police. No. What we are calling you out on is your insistence that he was fighting the police, which he clearly was not. Now you're trying to backtrack & hint that you really meant resisting arrest? Nice try but you failed miserably.

 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,535,640 times
Reputation: 2363
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No one has argued he didn't resist. Running away would be resisting. The overall large argument is that no one should ever be arrested for selling loose cigarette's on a street corner.
Agreed. Now, who enacted the laws that led to such draconian enforcement?
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:10 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,344,316 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No one has argued he didn't resist. Running away would be resisting. The overall large argument is that no one should ever be arrested for selling loose cigarette's on a street corner.
But, it is not the job of the police to make the laws.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:11 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by aplcr0331 View Post
Agreed. Now, who enacted the laws that led to such draconian enforcement?
Morons.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:12 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
But, it is not the job of the police to make the laws.
It is to up to them to follow the rules and the officer did not in this case.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:13 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,344,316 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
What are you even trying to prove? You are the one who said he was fighting police. We all told you to watch the video, which you obviously had not done, because he clearly was not fighting the police. Someone else mentioned resisting arrest which no one argued against. What we are calling you out on is your insistence that he was fighting the police, which he clearly was not. Now you're trying to backtrack & hint that you really meant resisting arrest? Nice try but you failed miserably.
Fighting the arrest......does that make you happy???

It is to bad this happened to Garner......I agree with that.

I said before.....I would like to have seen more from the EMT's.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:16 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,344,316 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It is to up to them to follow the rules and the officer did not in this case.
It looks that way to me too.......but, the GJ did not find it criminal.

I am sure the cop will be reprimanded at work.......maybe let go.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,187 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
It looks that way to me too.......but, the GJ did not find it criminal.

I am sure the cop will be reprimanded at work.......maybe let go.

Part of that is also because of what the DA did, especially by not allowing a Reckless Endangerment Charge.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:23 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
It looks that way to me too.......but, the GJ did not find it criminal.
They did not find for the charges presented to them. I wouldn't have either. The officer did not mean to kill him but indeed his actions which he was not allowed to do did lead to his death.

I would have found for manslaughter most likely.

Quote:
I am sure the cop will be reprimanded at work.......maybe let go.
That will show em.
 
Old 12-10-2014, 12:27 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,344,316 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Part of that is also because of what the DA did, especially by not allowing a Reckless Endangerment Charge.
I would agree with that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top