Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2014, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,509 posts, read 9,490,296 times
Reputation: 5621

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The government needs to tax road use at an appropriate level to build and maintain the roads. Nothing more, nothing less. Road use should be revenue neutral.
I agree.

Quote:
I think it is, it's a giant shell game and there is so many differences between the states it's ridiculous.
Ohio has an amendment to its constitution that prevents road taxes from being used on anything other than road construction and maintenance. But that doesn't prevent ODOT from getting billions of dollars elsewhere to keep building more roads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2014, 08:53 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookb4youcross View Post
I live in a 550sq ft single family house, and it is awful. The funny thing about you greenies, you don't ever practice what you preach.
Do you have a clue who you even replied to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 08:56 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR_C View Post
It's a poor choice, if they can't afford it. Are you suggesting that the government keep the price of gas lower, so that they can maintain their lifestyle?
The government while indirectly with it's monetary policy does affect the price of gas, they do not set it. Is it your desire that they do? (We have to start with factual statements to have a discussion)

Besides, the argument is that right now they can better afford it, you want the government to tax it so they can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 08:57 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Actually... 400 sq. feet is enough. We lived for the last 10 years quite comfortably in less than that. (My RV). Now... we bought another home (over 3000 sq ft) and the quality of life isn't that much different.
RV living was *your* choice. Seems you grew tired of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,141,865 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
RV living was *your* choice. Seems you grew tired of it.
Actually it was out of necessity. It is what it is... The fact is that people can make a life in whatever they have to. Would I do it again? Not by choice.. but if need be.. then I could. The fact that folks here are arguing over how much sq. footage you have to live is kind of ridiculous no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Where you aren't
1,245 posts, read 923,327 times
Reputation: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Do you have a clue who you even replied to?
Yes, oh I see, so then I imagined you admitting to living in a 4000 sq ft house, then you go on to tell others 400sq ft is just fine to live in
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,509 posts, read 9,490,296 times
Reputation: 5621
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The government while indirectly with it's monetary policy does affect the price of gas, they do not set it. Is it your desire that they do? (We have to start with factual statements to have a discussion)
No.

Quote:
Besides, the argument is that right now they can better afford it, you want the government to tax it so they can't.
The government wants to increase the gas tax, so that it comes closer to paying for roads, while the pain of doing so would be less, since gas prices are currently low. But some feel the gas tax shouldn't be raised, and roads continue to be subsidized to a greater extent, because an increased gas tax would adversely affect the people who depend on roads more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:14 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Actually it was out of necessity. It is what it is... The fact is that people can make a life in whatever they have to. Would I do it again? Not by choice.. but if need be.. then I could. The fact that folks here are arguing over how much sq. footage you have to live is kind of ridiculous no?
No. It's not any of our business how others choose to live. You lived and traveled in a gas guzzler. Should I be condemning that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:15 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookb4youcross View Post
Yes, oh I see, so then I imagined you admitting to living in a 4000 sq ft house, then you go on to tell others 400sq ft is just fine to live in
Strike two. Want to try again? Or are you doing this on purpose?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2014, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Where you aren't
1,245 posts, read 923,327 times
Reputation: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Actually... 400 sq. feet is enough. We lived for the last 10 years quite comfortably in less than that. (My RV). Now... we bought another home (over 3000 sq ft) and the quality of life isn't that much different.
400 sq ft isn't enough, unless you have nothing, that is the only way living in a tiny place like that would work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top