Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's statements like this that strip pro-lifers of all credibility.
If a woman dies before the birth, the fetus dies right along with her.....because it is part of her body.
Wrong! Where did you learn basic (7th grade) biology? The baby dies because the woman's body must provide oxygen (through the umbilical cord), NOT because the fetus is "part of the woman's body." It is not! It has it's own DNA (it is "separate flesh"), and it shares nothing with it's mother.
You need to take a biology course to correct your misconceptions (no pun intended).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53
If a woman dies after the birth, the baby does not die right along with her, as it is no longer part of her body.
And it never was "part of her body."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53
^^^ Pro-life logic at its finest. LOL
This is not "logic." It is science. It is biological fact. You are ignorant.
A fetus can have fully formed organs, but no brain.
Yes, its a bundle of cells, and at any rate, its none of my damned business what a grown adult does with their body. I don't like abortion, but its not for me to decide for anyone
So you think unborn children are the property of their mother.
"controlling her behavior" you now the morality police for all of womanhood? women can be as sexual as they please, use or not use BC just as a man does. saying yes to sex is not saying yes to pregnancy.
Nice try, but irrelevant.
They should take responsibility for their "sexual as they please" behavior, and the risks that go with it.
Saying "yes" to sex is accepting the risk.
You want to ignore the risk and take no responsibility for the consequences of that risk if you lose.
If somehow science could prove homosexuality was genetic and people used abortion as a means to curtail it you would hear howls from the Left regarding the lack of humanity.
Who do you think a mass of cells inside someone's body belongs to? The community? So you adhere to the "it takes a village" philosophy? Interesting.
The unborn baby doesn't "belong to" anyone. It's a human life and deserving of protection. Pro-choice women prefer to have the option of killing it so they can evade consequences for their poor decisions.
And let's face it, the vast, vast, vast percentage of U.S. abortions are done as a form of birth control.
Oh...well, those ARE just "blobs of cells," so you can go right ahead and abort those. Christians don't consider those to be humans whose lives have any value.
The unborn baby doesn't "belong to" anyone. It's a human life and deserving of protection. Pro-choice women prefer to have the option of killing it so they can evade consequences for their poor decisions.
And let's face it, the vast, vast, vast percentage of U.S. abortions are done as a form of birth control.
Tell you what. If you can remove that mass of cells from a woman and incubate it in a petrie dish without depending on the woman as an incubator, you can save all of those potential babies. Until you figure out a way to grow a baby without using a woman's body, then yeah, what's inside her body is hers. It sucks nutrients from her uses her body to thrive.
I know it irks you to not be able to control women, but too bad, so sad for you.
Last edited by HeyJude514; 12-16-2014 at 04:19 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.