Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-01-2015, 01:31 PM
 
152 posts, read 142,508 times
Reputation: 201

Advertisements

Must be something in there that's good, right? We've made it this far...

I think slowing down and gridlock, which everyone seems to hate, may actually be a benefit.
Keeps the country lumbering along and stops wild swings of power and influence.

Anyways, trying to think of the positives...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2015, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,451,064 times
Reputation: 4586
Let's say you have parties ranging from liberal to conservative - parties "A" to "E."

In an election Party A's candidate gets 15% of the vote, B 25%, C 24%, D 8%, and E 28%.

You are a socialist so you vote for Party A's candidate. However, assuming a plurality = a win, Party E won. You'd be much happier with Party B or C than the ultra-conservative Party E (and so would most voters likely due to the spread of votes) but you socialists are stuck with them.

This problem could be solved partially, but likely not entirely, with runoff or, more so, instant runoff voting. However, there would be other problems in terms of actual votes on legislation, appointments, etc. with parties voting for/against legislation for different reasons. Due to this, coalitions would form and it would naturally flow back to an essentially two-party system. But the majority's views may not really be represented in the meantime (though whether they are or aren't already is certainly debatable).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2015, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,874,742 times
Reputation: 14125
There have typically been two parties in the US government. The democratic-republicans and federalists started while Washington was in office as president. After that you had the Whigs which were the start of conservative politics after the federalists slowly died after Alexander Hamilton got killed by Aaron Burr in their famous duel. Then in the 1850s the Republicans and Democrats became their own parties and we have stayed that way since then.

I think it is good, can be better but besides Presidents, the public hates moderates and rather go towards the extremes. This is the case with the TEA Party they are not just conservatives but extremist even libertarian leaning and claim that moderate republicans are RINOs. As someone that would be a moderate republican, I hate that but what can you do unless the tea party or moderate republicans wanted to create a new party just for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2015, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,362,622 times
Reputation: 2922
The two party system keeps the lobbyist well clothed and fed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2015, 01:39 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,964,873 times
Reputation: 2177
We do not have a two party system.

There are many parties. They have tried, over the years, to use law and policy to block anyone else, but our political system is not party based, like the communists of old.

In fact, party is irrelevant to our electoral system and government function.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top