Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Back atcha - you swallow the nonsense commie/socialist popular media and fake, paid-for science "research" that irrationally spout what 'bama and the commies want you and everyone else to believe.
How do all those scientists, commies and socialists hiding under your bed cope with the dust bunnies?
sorry - I didn't pay enough attention to my search, but I remember in the 70s scientist saying via news stories/tv stories, that we may be entering an ice age. bottom line - science will tell you whatever you pay them to say - here you go: Consensus - not
Here is an extract:
Many of the outspoken scientists that disagree are retired. Due to the politicization of climate science, grants and funding are often cut off if scientists do not go along with the political consensus. “Joanne Simpson, the world's first woman to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology, expressed relief upon her retirement last year that she was finally free to speak "frankly" of her nonbelief. Dr. Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a U.N. climate report, dubs man-made warming "the worst scientific scandal in history." Norway's Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner for physics, decries it as the "new religion." A group of 54 noted physicists, led by Princeton's Will Happer, is demanding the American Physical Society revise its position that the science is settled.”
NASA will always be funded and are doing the same work they have always performed, they can predict global cooling and they will still be there but suddenly because the fossil fuel industry disagrees with their findings it's politics.
Good to have opposing points of view like Physicist Will Happer from Princeton but many of his views have been in error or unsubstantiated, I recall him stating that there was no ozone depletion. I don't believe he has don't any research to prove his point.
it would help if he didn't belong to foundations supported by fossil fuel companies.
Many denialists say this. When challenged to prove it, however, they fail. I expect you'll fail too. And when I say "prove this", I don't mean show me that another right-winger says the same thing on his blog, because that's worthless. I'd like to know who was paid, what they were paid, who paid them, what they were paid to find, and what the real science reveals. So get to it; prove your claim.
Same back at you - the climate-change movement is powerful and has tons of $$$ to buy whatever they want from scientists. the only proof will be with time and temps - and time has shown NO global warming over the past 15 years or so.
NASA will always be funded and are doing the same work they have always performed, they can predict global cooling and they will still be there but suddenly because the fossil fuel industry disagrees with their findings it's politics.
Good to have opposing points of view like Physicist Will Happer from Princeton but many of his views have been in error or unsubstantiated, it would help if he didn't belong to foundations supported by fossil fuel companies.
There are no "neutral" scientists in this debate. Everyone is being paid, or not paid, based on their "findings"
Ok,. for the really slow here. The "warming" in global warming refers to the climate. Not the weather
No - you are clearly not with it. It USED to be global warming - but since for the past 15 years or so there has been no global warming, the terminology has changed to "Climate Change" In this way, the climate crowd can explain how global cooling is also the fault of greedy, Republican humans (and Al Gore with his jet)
No - you are clearly not with it. It USED to be global warming - but since for the past 15 years or so there has been no global warming, the terminology has changed to "Climate Change" In this way, the climate crowd can explain how global cooling is also the fault of greedy, Republican humans (and Al Gore with his jet)
And once again debunking the same old nonsense claims parroted over and over again by the anti-science brigade..... (This has already been addressed twice in this very thread)
How strange that the IPCC is called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and was established in 1988.
Or that scientists have been using the term climate change since at least the 1950s.
Doesn't global warming mean EXTREMES IN WEATHER more... and more intense? Not merely getting milder winters and hotter summers?
Yes, extremes is exactly what it means.
.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
