Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2015, 10:29 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,326 posts, read 54,330,205 times
Reputation: 40716

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMORE View Post
What? I want more troops in Japan, what is the point of a mutual defense treaty if we're going to abandon our obligations as soon as things become fiery. Imagine the economy plummeting and the FDIC saying to you: "Yeah, we didn't anticipate the economy becoming bad therefore that $250,000 insured cash won't be payed out." Japan and China won't fight in a major theater, but minor skimmers can be expected and that DOESN'T need to jnvovle us, but in the hypothetical event of a China aggressive enough to invade Japan then we MUST stand by to help them; its not like we are Japan's military, we are more so their deterrent and we also stay they for forwarding against North Korea.

Plus Japan owns the second, soon to be first amount of U.S.-debt, the least we could do is stay there as a continued deterrent.
IF it's truly a mutual defense treaty, how many Japanese troops are stationed in the US defending our soil and how many yen is Japan spending to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2015, 10:36 AM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Global stability is a very good thing, very much worth the USA pitching in.

But I do agree with the OP somewhat.....many of our allies need to start shelling-out more $$$$$ to build up their defense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Well when you say, "hardly my problem" what am I supposed to think, but that you are posting out of emotion. "Hardly my problem" is not exactly a serious stance.

American-Japanese defense policies are done by concensus in both countries. It may not be "your problem" but the majority see it as their problem and has acted accordingly for more than half a century.
Consensus? Really?

These are agreements signed by politicians and diplomats. And whatever benefits there are to this "consensus" ...well, they're lost on me (and many if not most other common people).

I would bet that the overwhelming majority of Okinawans do not want us there. I'd also bet that most Americans don't believe that their taxes should be used to defend wealthy nations that are not only our economic competitors, but are easily capable of defending themselves.

People on this thread have already posted links showing that the Japanese themselves believe that they can and should be doing all of their own heavy lifting.

Again, the bottom line is that in 2015, there can be no reasonable justification for a broke United States to defend a wealthy e economic competitor nation such as Japan.

And I'm pretty sure that's the "consensus" of most people with common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 10:40 AM
 
56,989 posts, read 35,168,788 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
IF it's truly a mutual defense treaty, how many Japanese troops are stationed in the US defending our soil and how many yen is Japan spending to do so?
Mutual defense is a canard. It means "you defend me, and I'll do whatever I can to help you."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,175 posts, read 27,558,641 times
Reputation: 16026
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
IF it's truly a mutual defense treaty, how many Japanese troops are stationed in the US defending our soil and how many yen is Japan spending to do so?
I don't want to see any Japanese troops stationed in the US.

The Japanese government paid Â¥217 billion (US$ 2.0 billion) in 2007[4] as annual host-nation support called Omoiyari Yosan (思いやり予算?, sympathy budget or compassion budget).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Forces_Japan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 11:40 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,326 posts, read 54,330,205 times
Reputation: 40716
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Mutual defense is a canard. It means "you defend me, and I'll do whatever I can to help you."
Seems more like "YOU man and pay for my defense and I'll have a good thought for your defense"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 12:17 PM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,762,071 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Consensus? Really?

These are agreements signed by politicians and diplomats. And whatever benefits there are to this "consensus" ...well, they're lost on me (and many if not most other common people).

I would bet that the overwhelming majority of Okinawans do not want us there. I'd also bet that most Americans don't believe that their taxes should be used to defend wealthy nations that are not only our economic competitors, but are easily capable of defending themselves.

People on this thread have already posted links showing that the Japanese themselves believe that they can and should be doing all of their own heavy lifting.

Again, the bottom line is that in 2015, there can be no reasonable justification for a broke United States to defend a wealthy e economic competitor nation such as Japan.

And I'm pretty sure that's the "consensus" of most people with common sense.
Yes, Consensus.

We are talking about agreements between democratic nations. If they did not want us there, we would leave (there is precedent for that). Likewise, if what you (and I) desire were favored by the majority, it would happen. It does not because the majority does not wish it.

This has been the consensus since 1945. Your complaints are nothing new. I would love it if America transformed into a larger version of Switzerland. But I am in the minority. So are you.

And dude, Okinawa is but one small part of Japan. The rest of Japan does not care what they think. There's that tricky notion of majority again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,948 posts, read 17,844,201 times
Reputation: 10370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Firstly, it is true. Japan kicks in a lot of money for our presence there. Not all, but a lot.

Secondly, allowing Japan to "do it alone" as you say is a rather frightening notion to most of Asia and to the Japanese themselves. Something to do with....World War II.

Thirdly, Japan cannot do it alone because of Article 5 in their Constitution that we wrote for them during the Occupation.

Don't get me wrong- I sympathize with your premise to some extent. Just better to have some facts rather than raw passion.
Kicks in a lot so why not all of it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 03:28 PM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,762,071 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Kicks in a lot so why not all of it?
Well I do not work at the DOD. However, I would guess it is because US forces in Japan are no longer Occupation forces. And the defense of Japan is not the only reason. Japan is a good base for our forces over there. China, Russia, North Korea are all nearby.

In short, Logistics.

Think of our forces in Germany and Italy. We are not occupying them. And we are no longer defending them from the USSR. However, the bases there were very useful for operations in Bosnia, Iraq, Libya, etc.

Logistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,175 posts, read 27,558,641 times
Reputation: 16026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
Well I do not work at the DOD. However, I would guess it is because US forces in Japan are no longer Occupation forces. And the defense of Japan is not the only reason. Japan is a good base for our forces over there. China, Russia, North Korea are all nearby.

In short, Logistics.

Think of our forces in Germany and Italy. We are not occupying them. And we are no longer defending them from the USSR. However, the bases there were very useful for operations in Bosnia, Iraq, Libya, etc.

Logistics.
I read it somewhere on the internet that the USA ARE closing a lot of bases in Germany - and Germans (especially in the communities around the bases) are rather unhappy about this. The US bases have been a steady source of income for decades, in what normally wasn't a well-off area of Germany.

I don't know if this is true or not, but this makes me pretty mad. If they want military (American military) base there, then they should not be bi*ching and moaning about American foreign policy. It is about time for these European countries to defend themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2015, 03:57 PM
 
26,447 posts, read 15,041,601 times
Reputation: 14604
Because our allies know that we are omnipresent with a "big stick" it puts us at a disadvantage and gives them an advantage.

-It encourages us to spend more on military, which means we have less on improving our own people's lives

-It adds more debt that will hurt all Americans

-It allows our allies to spend less on military and more on improving their people's lives

-We often don't get a lot of credit for providing defense for allies, spending a lot of money (including service family $) boosting foreign economies, and in fact our bases are sometimes resented by local populace in some locations


Certainly there are benefits to being a world super power, but there are also drawbacks to having so many military bases all over - and (non-combat zone) military bases that are still growing in number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top