Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't disagree...... what's that have to do with the price of tea in China though?
No one ever said you were less vulnerable to attack just because you carry a gun, and no one has ever said that it's impossible to have it taken from you.
You should take to the gun nuts on this site that seem to think their guns prevent crimes and make them besuperheroes.
Actually I am wondering how the attacker got him in a chokehold if he saw his attacker beforehand. Seems like he might have been a careless gun owner or was just carrying his gun around to show it off.
That makes more sense, it prevents situations where it might alarm other people seeing we do live in a country where people opening fire in crowded places does happen.
In this thread...no you are not...you even stated he should be better...
No, I believe the man with the gun was the victim. I do however think that if he is going to carry a gun he should be more aware of his surroundings to prevent someone from being able to get ahold of a loaded gun. This sounds like it could have been much worse had his attacker gotten ahold of his gun.
I reread the article, it doesn't say why he attacked him inside the Walmart rather than in the parking lot. Maybe I missed something you saw. If you know the answer to your own question, feel free to share it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.