Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No matter who is elected, it would be a relief to have an executive officer that simply executes the laws enacted by Congress, instead of seeking to be a "leader" or "super legislator."
Things wouldn't be too different really. The roles would switch. The Democrats would refuse to work with the executive brach. The grid lock would continue, except we'd have a president who is a far less effective communicator, which would lose her popularity and the possibility that she would be a one term president would be very high.
Though the chances of her being elected are slim as well. The Tea Party doesn't have nearly enough power to get her in the white house given that Democrats and Republicans alike see her as just a very attention desperate person.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
